Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TigressDem

(5,125 posts)
7. Right.
Fri Jun 4, 2021, 10:12 AM
Jun 2021

1) Logistically, you can't dose a crowd in secret.

Unless it was a LOT of already susceptible individuals hitting key individuals.

2) People will notice. Not everyone would get a dose.

Maybe... unless it was done from behind and NOT everyone would HAVE to be dosed and not everyone acted on violent impulses.

3) Rallies are videoed and live streamed.

Did anyone think to look in the videos for such a crazy thing to be happening? I mean if even WE on DU understand that this would be the lowest of the low type of thing to do and our brains reel away from the crazy... have we seen ANY bar too low for tRump and followers to scrape under?

4) To get a 100% dosage (so nobody notices, regardless that live-stream video audiences would notice), you would get many deadly overdoses and lots of reactions requiring medical attention.

NOW like I said, I WANT TO BE WRONG.... but it would NOT require the whole crowd to be dosed, just enough to get some of them to break the ice and step over that line.

Everyone was being directed there anyway.

GET REAL.

I AM REAL. I want to be wrong. I hope I am wrong.

However, IF the people in these situations were not aware of being chemically influenced and IF that were a test it would have to be done while they were still under the influence.

It is kind of a way to commit the perfect crime.

Can't be proven if we don't think it's at all possible that the former pRez would stoop that low.



Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»National Security & Defense»Ever heard of Scopolamine...»Reply #7