Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
4. The LCS was designed for automation and minimal crew.
Sat Aug 2, 2014, 09:16 AM
Aug 2014

They already had to add another crew module because they didn't have enough people to properly maintain it.

LCS #1 broke down on it's initial cruise to the Far East. (Kinda reminds me of the USS San Antonio's troubles.)

Mission modules are still not available.

A 57mm pop gun for main armament? Really?

Congress, in its infinite wisdom ordered 52 more of these over-priced things to keep the shipyards going.

Congress, in its infinite wisdom, then cut the order from 52 new ships to 32 new ships.

Congress, in its infinite wisdom, should scrap the LCS program and tell the DoD to figure out how to build semi-affordable ships.

IMO the LCS program closely resembles the F-35 program. Late, doesn't work as advertised, and very overpriced.

Seriously? Tetris_Iguana Jul 2014 #1
Especially true in the military. truebluegreen Jul 2014 #2
Sounds about right. Dayton L. Kitchens Aug 2014 #3
The LCS was designed for automation and minimal crew. unhappycamper Aug 2014 #4
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»National Security & Defense»Navy secretary says comba...»Reply #4