Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
3. The theory is well understood and public at this point.
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 08:38 AM
Oct 2014

The hard parts are

a.) the intrinsic difficulties in working with such materials and obtaining the necessary raw materials.
b.) working out a device architecture with the necessary precisision, for which you can resort to theft (popular) or engage in a lot of testing.

N. Korea's nukes are primarily intended to serve as deterrents to anybody wanting to change their kleptocratic government, thus it doesn't have to be real, it just has to be credible.

N. Korea in fact lacks the means to pursue aggressive warfare with any chance of success outside the peninsula.

We already know they can make a nuke. This is about making a nuke compact enough to put on a rocket (a SCUD one presumes or something similar). That would enhance their deterrent. But the fact is that their artillery coverage of Seoul is probably sufficient deterrent already.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»National Security & Defense»N.Korea Can Build Nuclear...»Reply #3