Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

African American

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)

5. Wow ...

Reply to gollygee (Original post)

Sat May 30, 2015, 08:58 AM

May 2015

there's about half a century of precedent that the ruling should have been different. I'm posting to this so that later I can go find and read the GASC's opinion. There has to be something else in there more than "Prosecutors had not “demonstrated purposeful discrimination” in striking black jurors."

There just has to be!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

29 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

No one in GD is interested in this but maybe this group will be [View all] gollygee May 2015 OP

Good grief, that happened this year???? NYC_SKP May 2015 #1

Despicable blackspade May 2015 #2

That's scary. SusanCalvin May 2015 #3

I read the gd post earlier gwheezie May 2015 #4

Wow ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #5

The judges remark to the jury alone should warrent a retrial azurnoir May 2015 #6

Hell yes.... daleanime May 2015 #12

+1 Enthusiast May 2015 #24

amerikkka 2015 heaven05 May 2015 #7

In a 2008 case, SCOTUS ruled for the defendant.. mountain grammy May 2015 #8

That is sick and criminal. Dont call me Shirley May 2015 #9

Horrible Lisa D May 2015 #10

But it's not race, it's class!!1 Number23 May 2015 #11

This is a case of straight forward racism..... daleanime May 2015 #13

This has NOTHING to do with class. And most racism doesn't either. Number23 May 2015 #14

No, it doesn't. Like I said this case is straight racism.... daleanime May 2015 #17

Why do you keep posting the angel smiley? Number23 May 2015 #18

My attempt to show that I'm being honest..... daleanime May 2015 #19

Terrible! SoapBox May 2015 #15

What would the outcome of the Supreme Court case decide? Ford_Prefect May 2015 #16

If you read the OP gollygee May 2015 #20

I have no doubt he was denied due process through the striking of black jury candidates, Ford_Prefect May 2015 #21

It's possible that he still thinks he'd be found guilty gollygee May 2015 #27

Horrible system-wide racism Lifelong Protester May 2015 #22

Jesus Christ...... Enthusiast May 2015 #23

Jury of one's peers shouldn't *have* to be the same race, but... they excluded them. freshwest May 2015 #25

Well this is the state that executed Troy Davis Kalidurga May 2015 #26

As I thought, the case isn't as ridiculously clear, as presented ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #28

It has been suggested the Foster jury candidates were "herded" to arrange more black prospects Ford_Prefect May 2015 #29