Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
African American
In reply to the discussion: The Breakdown… [View all]sheshe2
(98,746 posts)11. White America’s racial illiteracy: Why our national conversation is poisoned from the start
The author of "What Does It Mean to Be White?" examines the ways white people implode when they talk about race
Dr. Robin DiAngelo, The Good Men Project

Yes, we will develop strong emotionally laden opinions, but they will not be informed opinions. Our socialization renders us racially illiterate. When you add a lack of humility to that illiteracy (because we dont know what we dont know), you get the break-down we so often see when trying to engage white people in meaningful conversations about race.
Mainstream dictionary definitions reduce racism to individual racial prejudice and the intentional actions that result. The people that commit these intentional acts are deemed bad, and those that dont are good. If we are against racism and unaware of committing racist acts, we cant be racist; racism and being a good person have become mutually exclusive. But this definition does little to explain how racial hierarchies are consistently reproduced.
Social scientists understand racism as a multidimensional and highly adaptive systema system that ensures an unequal distribution of resources between racial groups. Because whites built and dominate all significant institutions, (often at the expense of and on the uncompensated labor of other groups), their interests are embedded in the foundation of U.S. society.
While individual whites may be against racism, they still benefit from the distribution of resources controlled by their group. Yes, an individual person of color can sit at the tables of power, but the overwhelming majority of decision-makers will be white. Yes, white people can have problems and face barriers, but systematic racism wont be one of them. This distinctionbetween individual prejudice and a system of unequal institutionalized racial poweris fundamental. One cannot understand how racism functions in the U.S. today if one ignores group power relations.
http://www.salon.com/2015/04/10/white_americas_racial_illiteracy_why_our_national_conversation_is_poisoned_from_the_start_partner/
Thank you MrScorpio. True analysis.
I need to get out of here for awhile. I need a break. This place is pissing me off.
Thanks again.
K&R
Dr. Robin DiAngelo, The Good Men Project

Yes, we will develop strong emotionally laden opinions, but they will not be informed opinions. Our socialization renders us racially illiterate. When you add a lack of humility to that illiteracy (because we dont know what we dont know), you get the break-down we so often see when trying to engage white people in meaningful conversations about race.
Mainstream dictionary definitions reduce racism to individual racial prejudice and the intentional actions that result. The people that commit these intentional acts are deemed bad, and those that dont are good. If we are against racism and unaware of committing racist acts, we cant be racist; racism and being a good person have become mutually exclusive. But this definition does little to explain how racial hierarchies are consistently reproduced.
Social scientists understand racism as a multidimensional and highly adaptive systema system that ensures an unequal distribution of resources between racial groups. Because whites built and dominate all significant institutions, (often at the expense of and on the uncompensated labor of other groups), their interests are embedded in the foundation of U.S. society.
While individual whites may be against racism, they still benefit from the distribution of resources controlled by their group. Yes, an individual person of color can sit at the tables of power, but the overwhelming majority of decision-makers will be white. Yes, white people can have problems and face barriers, but systematic racism wont be one of them. This distinctionbetween individual prejudice and a system of unequal institutionalized racial poweris fundamental. One cannot understand how racism functions in the U.S. today if one ignores group power relations.
http://www.salon.com/2015/04/10/white_americas_racial_illiteracy_why_our_national_conversation_is_poisoned_from_the_start_partner/
Thank you MrScorpio. True analysis.
I need to get out of here for awhile. I need a break. This place is pissing me off.
Thanks again.
K&R
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
154 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Maybe they didn't like seeing mine and others' Avatars depicting Brave was Censored on DU?
Cha
Sep 2015
#113
Great job, MrScorpio. And you made an important point that hadn't occurred to me at all.
pnwmom
Sep 2015
#10
White America’s racial illiteracy: Why our national conversation is poisoned from the start
sheshe2
Sep 2015
#11
'We' is a pronoun used by Theodore Kaszynski to imply the existence of a group called Freedom Club.
NBachers
Sep 2015
#12
Idiot and Bernie supporter are not necessarily exclusive descriptors. n/t
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Sep 2015
#34
Mahalo for your post, EBB. "So by screwing with people on a blog, and assigning it more importance
Cha
Sep 2015
#117
Plus why would a RW troll be concerned with Sanders ( or DU) at this time when Trump
Person 2713
Sep 2015
#70
I have to say that many who deny it is a DU Bernie supporter, have no qualms
boston bean
Sep 2015
#72
I'm not convinced, either. My very first thought when I read it was that it was a woman. nt
scarletwoman
Sep 2015
#124
This is a great analysis, I agree with everything except the gender of the @$$-wipe
etherealtruth
Sep 2015
#85
Make sure to point out to those people that the letters didn't have to be shown to us
MrScorpio
Sep 2015
#103
The letter could also come from a Bernie supporter who can't tolerate a strong, independent...
Spazito
Sep 2015
#112
Yes, Spazito.. MrScorpio brought out too many logical points about the letter wrtiter being a BS
Cha
Sep 2015
#114
Brilliant, MrScorpio.. Thank you so much for deconstructing this with such detailed analysis.
Cha
Sep 2015
#110
I'd bet that the writer of this letter could be identified with reasonable certainty.
kwassa
Sep 2015
#116
Thank you for your excellent analysis. I agree that it IS a Duer, but not that it's a male.
scarletwoman
Sep 2015
#122