Scalia attributed the repeated renewal of Section 5 to a perpetuation of racial entitlement. He said, Whenever a society adopts racial entitlements, it is very difficult to get out of them through the normal political processes.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who asked many questions in defense of the law, appeared taken aback by Scalias insinuation. In the final moments of oral argument, she asked Bert Rein, the lawyer for the challengers, if he agrees.
Do you think think Section 5 was voted for because it was a racial entitlement? she asked. When he ducked the question, she asked it again. He did not endorse Scalias sentiment.
The Reagan-appointed jurist said lawmakers keep reauthorizing the Voting Rights Act out of fear of political repercussions. In a sarcastic tone, he described it as odd that congressional renewal has passed with growing margins over the years in spite of the fact that racism is widely acknowledged to have become less severe in the covered jurisdictions since 1965.
Shocking! It can't be that because of the very type of legislation he's whining about, racism and other ills are actually becoming LESSENED??!
What. An. Asshole.
Whoops! Forgot the link
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2013/02/scalia-attacks-congress-for-renewing-voting-rights-act.php