Am I the only one shocked at how many DUers still don't "get it?"

[hfojvt]

112. you provide very little, almost no evidence, for calling something a "racist, bullshit lie"

When you say there is no evidence, you apparently then consider
1) the fact that Trayvon had ample time to escape
2) the fact of Zimmerman's injuries
3) the wet grass on the back of Zimmerman's coat
4) the testimony of John Good
5) the testimony that says Trayvon was on top (john Good again and others)
6) the evidence of somebody screaming for help

all of that is NO evidence.

You know what else? I don't know jack squat about DNA, and I suspect you do not either. Does an absence of DNA prove something? I have no idea how that works. How much DNA should be on my hand if I pop somebody in the nose in the rain.

I go around thinking that six pieces of evidence is more important than a lack of evidence in something I don't understand.

I THINK, perhaps strongly THINK that is what happened. You OTOH are ABSOLUTELY SURE that it did not.'

That's one of the troubling things - the absolute hostile certainty of the Zimmerman detractors.