Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gothmog

(177,271 posts)
1. History supports the OP
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 06:53 AM
Apr 2016

It has been been my experience that the OP is correct in its analysis http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2015/09/bernie_sanders_presidential_campaign_what_would_it_take_for_the_vermont.html

. For as much as black Americans might like his policy positions—which fit their enthusiasm for a stronger safety net—they’re also strategic voters, not ideological stalwarts. Electability is key, and as a consequence, they tend to back the establishment choice: Al Gore over Bill Bradley; John Kerry over John Edwards. On occasion, blacks will back a factional candidate, like Jesse Jackson in 1984 and 1988. But Jackson had the reverse problem—he couldn’t win enough whites.

Again, Sanders would have a stronger campaign if someone could provide a good explanation as to viability

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

History supports the OP Gothmog Apr 2016 #1
And ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2016 #6
They did not teach this method of persuasion in my law school Gothmog Apr 2016 #7
Nor, mine. ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2016 #8
We know that Coolest Ranger Apr 2016 #2
It's all true. rusty quoin Apr 2016 #3
Thank you for this, Cali! Cha Apr 2016 #4
While there are parts of the OP article Uponthegears Apr 2016 #5
An interesting analysis Number23 Apr 2016 #9
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»African American»The Pragmatic Tradition o...»Reply #1