African American
In reply to the discussion: Why did Sanders wait until we have a black president to cast blame and start his "revolution"? [View all]OneGrassRoot
(23,955 posts)I know there have been criticisms of President Obama from those on the left because many now Sanders' supporters feel he didn't push for change hard enough. (And, yes, I believe there is definitely racist, supremacist behavior on the left, so some of it is racist in origin). As I said above, I'm trying to ignore the supporters on both sides -- because this shit is just as nasty as 2008 -- and pay attention to the candidates themselves and, yes, who they choose as surrogates.
I haven't interpreted Sanders' criticism of Obama as being remotely similar in intent to the GOP, nor reflective of some of the Sanders' supporters -- the contingent that loathes both Hillary and Obama. I mean, absolute loathing...the ones who say they'll vote for Trump if Hillary wins the nomination.
When it comes to Sanders and Obama (and now Hillary), I perceive it as the two clashing perspectives of incremental change versus revolution; working within the system or dismantling it from the outside. I understand both sides of that ideological disagreement.
I think it's actually a COMPLIMENT to President Obama that Occupy and even the Arab Spring and other revolutions (regardless of the ultimate outcome) happened under his watch. I think his message of hope and change was sincere and resonated, and something about his presidency provided the space for the idea of revolution to take hold in a big way.
Angry protests happened under Bush, but the possibility of revolution -- with a positive, hopeful vibe to it, even though spurred by anger and frustration -- took root under President Obama.
Maybe that's naive, but that's my take on it. I don't loathe Obama, Hillary or Bernie -- far from it, as I appreciate all three in different ways even if I have strong differences and wish things were done differently -- so I have a different perspective than most.