Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(107,002 posts)
19. The first pass was when "were legally online when it happened" applies
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 03:02 PM
14 hrs ago

If they are "beyond the defense" now, then "legally online when it happened" has to refer to a previous time when neither were beyond the defense. And the second pass is when you want an attacking player to be allowed to pass to a teammate who is in front of him, with only one (or no) defender between him and the goal. Your justification for this would be "the passer only has one (or no) defender between him and the goal as well".

So, with Z being the keeper (and the goal at the top of the diagram), and Y a defender, A the attacking passer, and B the receiving attacker, you want this position at the point of the pass from A to be offside, as it is already:
________________Z

________B
_____________Y
___________________A

but this to be allowed, with the defender further away from the goal:
________________Z

________B
___________________A
_____________Y

and your justification for that is "at some earlier time, Y was between both A and B and the goal". So as well as the pass from A to B, this previous time needs to be defined, and noted by the officials. A nightmare to sort out (even if you are able to construct a workable definition), and because you think a one-on-one attacker-goalie situation is not exciting enough.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It's a game of millimeters now Ponietz Saturday #1
So what? Borh were ahead of the defense. n/t aggiesal Saturday #2
There must be two defenders for a forward pass in the opponent's half regardless of where the passer is Ponietz Saturday #3
What a ridiculous rule, if that's the case. ... aggiesal Saturday #4
Okay then Ponietz Saturday #6
That gives a massive benefit to the goalie, since he knows they can't pass to the other player. ... aggiesal Saturday #9
if the receiver is behind the passer it is a good pass rampartd Saturday #11
If a team is good enough to get multiple players behind the defense, ... aggiesal Saturday #7
It's easy to get behind the defense Ponietz Saturday #8
I'm not referring to players camping out behind the defense ... aggiesal Saturday #10
It might be interesting to experiment with your idea Ponietz Saturday #12
I have no idea why it would change the game, since ... aggiesal Saturday #13
Perhaps having multiple teammates behind the defense rarely occurs because it would be offside muriel_volestrangler 22 hrs ago #14
This message was self-deleted by its author Ponietz Saturday #5
Another thing - not a good angle for the picture, but I suspect white no. 5 is closer to the goal than the passer muriel_volestrangler 22 hrs ago #15
I agree the image down the line would be better ... aggiesal 18 hrs ago #16
This rule is consistent. You're just saying "I wish there were a different rule, because I'd like it more" muriel_volestrangler 18 hrs ago #17
If there is a breakaway, (Player with a ball past the defenders with only Goalie in front), then aggiesal 14 hrs ago #18
The first pass was when "were legally online when it happened" applies muriel_volestrangler 14 hrs ago #19
No, more like this aggiesal 13 hrs ago #20
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Sports»Here's another ⚽ Of...»Reply #19