Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Sports

Showing Original Post only (View all)

mahatmakanejeeves

(69,095 posts)
Tue Jan 22, 2019, 01:37 PM Jan 2019

Wild NFL rule allows Roger Goodell to reverse Rams-Saints outcome, but would he actually use it? [View all]

Wild NFL rule allows Roger Goodell to reverse Rams-Saints outcome, but would he actually use it?
The NFL commissioner has the power to reverse the outcome of a football game
Will Brinson @WillBrinson 2h ago • 3 min read

After all the insanity of Championship Sunday wrapped, it was almost hard to comprehend all the crazy things that happened throughout the day. One thing stood above all else though: the Rams pass interference penalty against the Saints that went uncalled by the referees and ultimately allowed the Rams to advance to their first Super Bowl since 2001.

Lingering with that game and the outcome is the NFL's lack of a statement about the lack of a penalty. And lingering over that is a pretty insane and broad rule in the NFL rulebook that would allow NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell, should he so choose, to reverse or reschedule the outcome of the game between the Saints and Rams.

No, really. Goodell could either tell the Rams "sorry" and send the Saints to the Super Bowl or he could make them play the NFC Championship Game again. Either situation falls deep in the realm of the unlikely, but Rule 17, Section 2, Article 1, as noted by Pro Football Talk's Mike Florio, does exist.

And it reads like this:

"The Commissioner has the sole authority to investigate and take appropriate disciplinary and/or corrective measures if any club action, non-participant interference, or calamity occurs in an NFL game which the Commissioner deems so extraordinarily unfair or outside the accepted tactics encountered in professional football that such action has a major effect on the result of the game."
....
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Very unlikely duforsure Jan 2019 #1
My son had heard this discussed on a sports call-in show SCantiGOP Jan 2019 #7
The Chiefs have as good a claim as the Saints. Ponietz Jan 2019 #2
The phantom roughing the passer happened with 7+ hughee99 Jan 2019 #12
There was a missed facemask on Goff the possession before that JonLP24 Jan 2019 #14
I agree. There were a number of bad/missed calls, including the pick play on the chiefs touchdown. hughee99 Jan 2019 #15
I made no argument about the Chiefs game JonLP24 Jan 2019 #16
The post I was originally responding to was suggesting hughee99 Jan 2019 #17
I Didn't Watch The Game But I Saw The Clip Of The Pass Interference..... global1 Jan 2019 #3
You can't review a pass interference call, it's on the list of non-reviewable calls. LisaM Jan 2019 #4
Does That Mean The Saints Couldn't Have Challenged The Call As Well?....nt global1 Jan 2019 #9
Correct (though it was also under 2 minutes, and you can't challenge under 2 minutes). LisaM Jan 2019 #10
Won't happen, ever. Many errors in calls that effected the Rams too... beachbum bob Jan 2019 #5
Saints fans have started a petition on Change.org... Different Drummer Jan 2019 #6
Appears we are seeing a Wellstone ruled Jan 2019 #8
If he didn't use it to reverse the 2009 Bountygate NFCC game, then he won't for this. trotsky Jan 2019 #11
this would create a nightmare for sports books. Mosby Jan 2019 #13
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Sports»Wild NFL rule allows Roge...»Reply #0