Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Very unlikely duforsure Jan 2019 #1
My son had heard this discussed on a sports call-in show SCantiGOP Jan 2019 #7
The Chiefs have as good a claim as the Saints. Ponietz Jan 2019 #2
The phantom roughing the passer happened with 7+ hughee99 Jan 2019 #12
There was a missed facemask on Goff the possession before that JonLP24 Jan 2019 #14
I agree. There were a number of bad/missed calls, including the pick play on the chiefs touchdown. hughee99 Jan 2019 #15
I made no argument about the Chiefs game JonLP24 Jan 2019 #16
The post I was originally responding to was suggesting hughee99 Jan 2019 #17
I Didn't Watch The Game But I Saw The Clip Of The Pass Interference..... global1 Jan 2019 #3
You can't review a pass interference call, it's on the list of non-reviewable calls. LisaM Jan 2019 #4
Does That Mean The Saints Couldn't Have Challenged The Call As Well?....nt global1 Jan 2019 #9
Correct (though it was also under 2 minutes, and you can't challenge under 2 minutes). LisaM Jan 2019 #10
Won't happen, ever. Many errors in calls that effected the Rams too... beachbum bob Jan 2019 #5
Saints fans have started a petition on Change.org... Different Drummer Jan 2019 #6
Appears we are seeing a Wellstone ruled Jan 2019 #8
If he didn't use it to reverse the 2009 Bountygate NFCC game, then he won't for this. trotsky Jan 2019 #11
this would create a nightmare for sports books. Mosby Jan 2019 #13
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Sports»Wild NFL rule allows Roge...»Reply #1