Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OmahaBlueDog

(10,000 posts)
2. I wasn't aware that was a widely held perception
Sun Jan 1, 2012, 07:07 PM
Jan 2012

If he's not completely recovered, the Colts clearly MUST go in a different direction. I think everyone would agree on that.

Let's say he's completely recovered for the sake of discussion. He's still in the last five years of his career and he's due a big contract payment this year ($28M if I understand correctly). The Colts would be in the same position the Packers were in when they had aging Brett Favre, and the opportunity to take Aaron Rodgers. In Green Bay's case, Favre wouldn't mentor Rodgers and was ultimately shown the door. Do the Colts want that drama? Even damaged Manning could potentially garner some market value with teams like Washington or Minnesota.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Football»You are the Indianapolis ...»Reply #2