Religion
In reply to the discussion: Bill de Blasio under fire for omitting Catholic clergy from 60-member transition team [View all]skepticscott
(13,029 posts)but I didn't. I said nothing about "personal animosity" and I didn't say that anything was "acceptable". I pointed out that your claim of that "calling a believer a 'drooling mouthed, bigoted moron' is perfectly acceptable" rings pretty hollow, since the reason that a jury accepted it without hiding had nothing whatsoever to do with your being a "believer". That jury apparently felt that appellation suited you perfectly and that you personally deserved it, belief notwithstanding, in spite of site rules.
And the only double standard here is yours. You're the one that thinks it's perfectly acceptable to call people "arseholes" and "bigots" here as long as you think that's what they are, but when someone calls you a mean name because they think that's what YOU are, you get all whiny and start playing the poor, persecuted "believer". And kudos the to juror who pointed that out to you. Pot
meet kettle..goose..gander.