Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

Kurmudgeon

(1,751 posts)

6. Why don't you reread Exodus 21:22-24?

Reply to salvorhardin (Original post)

Mon Feb 20, 2012, 10:45 AM

Feb 2012

Exodus 21:22-24 King James Version (KJV)
22If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman's husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine.
23And if any mischief follow, then thou shalt give life for life,
24Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,

Now what part of that leads you to believe that killing an unborn child is not considered a capitol offense in Exodus?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

28 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The �biblical view� that�s younger than the Happy Meal [View all] salvorhardin Feb 2012 OP

Thank you for the post, very informative CanonRay Feb 2012 #1

Thank you for sharing this. MinneapolisMatt Feb 2012 #2

Fascinating! I loved the comment on slacktivist about twins and chimerae Pholus Feb 2012 #3

Good Twin/Evil Twin. DCKit Feb 2012 #13

Thanks for the clear thinking ewagner Feb 2012 #4

Hard to tell salvorhardin Feb 2012 #8

Wow. tanyev Feb 2012 #5

Why don't you reread Exodus 21:22-24? Kurmudgeon Feb 2012 #6

My views are not stated salvorhardin Feb 2012 #7

It's interesting the poster you're replying to doesn't offer any comment about such change. 2ndAmForComputers Feb 2012 #18

Why would anyone care what people in the Bronze Age _ed_ Feb 2012 #9

The bit where it says "he shall pay" is the giveaway muriel_volestrangler Feb 2012 #10

Break it down: Causing the miscarriage is a lesser offense. TalkingDog Feb 2012 #11

If we are reduced to proof-texting out of the Levitic code, we have a world of problems. Thats my opinion Feb 2012 #14

This is the correct answer. 2ndAmForComputers Feb 2012 #19

In your opinion, what does "if mischief follow" mean? Looks pretty vague. 2ndAmForComputers Feb 2012 #17

The men don't JUST cause a miscarriage. They harm her in a substantial way. TalkingDog Feb 2012 #20

Numbers 5 is why. Sal316 Feb 2012 #24

Interesting - a literal reading of that would support abortion after rape muriel_volestrangler Feb 2012 #27

Help out an ignorant non-religious person. rhett o rick Feb 2012 #12

The only place in all the Bible where abortion is dealt with is Numbers Chapter 5. Thats my opinion Feb 2012 #15

So if you ask Rick Santorum if abortion is acceptable under those conditions TalkingDog Feb 2012 #23

No evangelical here, (most of them have never read the Bible) but I have read it. TalkingDog Feb 2012 #22

I love that blog starroute Feb 2012 #16

I admire Clark's writing too salvorhardin Feb 2012 #21

Fascinating. I had no idea about this. Thanks for posting. cbayer Feb 2012 #25

The Didache is pretty explicit. rug Feb 2012 #26

Yah... most evangelicals have read the non-canonical works TalkingDog Feb 2012 #28