What's wrong with religion is that it has always enabled people like...

[MarkCharles]

64. "other variables of which you speak mean little when the numbers are so pronounced"

Ok, here's an experiment you and I can do...

Your religious football team, 11 members, equipped with rocks, my team, one fire-thrower and 9 machine guns and a B-2 bomber.

Tell me... how does that
"mean nothing" to your team when we line up and fire?

Logic of your arguments seems to have left you back with the stone or bronze or iron or steel age those "other ways of knowing" (other than science and history), whereas I advanced to the cyber world, and to satellite communication, you're still trying to figure out smoke signals for your side... but you are free to carry on... with such foolish apples to oranges comparisons, and try to make your case.. if more advanced people kill more, they are more dangerous, or not, whatever you decide.

Is atheism the enemy? Or is technology of warfare? You decide what part of that argument advances your case, and ignore the other part which we will all focus upon when you ignore one. You don't know about any debate strategy, now, do you? REALLY, you don't, do you?

Summary of lack of logical argument, and primary logical fallacy:

Atheists with advanced science-based weapons killed more, theists with primitive weapons in previous wars killed less, therefore Atheists are worse because they killed more!. Logic??? Anyone??? Anyone?? Beuhler? Beuhler?