Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 04:29 PM Feb 2012

Muslim Attacks Atheist. Muslim Judge Dismisses Case, Blames Victim. [View all]

Last edited Wed Feb 22, 2012, 10:47 PM - Edit history (1)

The Pennsylvania State Director of American Atheists, Inc., Mr. Ernest Perce V., was assaulted by a Muslim while participating in a Halloween parade. Along with a Zombie Pope, Ernest was costumed as Zombie Muhammad. The assault was caught on video, the Muslim man admitted to his crime and charges were filed in what should have been an open-and-shut case. That’s not what happened, though.

The defendant is an immigrant and claims he did not know his actions were illegal, or that it was legal in this country to represent Muhammad in any form. To add insult to injury, he also testified that his 9 year old son was present, and the man said he felt he needed to show his young son that he was willing to fight for his Prophet.

The case went to trial, and as circumstances would dictate, Judge Mark Martin is also a Muslim. What transpired next was surreal. The Judge not only ruled in favor of the defendant, but called Mr. Perce a name and told him that if he were in a Muslim country, he’d be put to death. Judge Martin’s comments included,

--snip--

The Judge neglected to address the fact that the ignorance of the law does not justify an assault and that it was the responsibility of the defendant to familiarize himself with our laws. This is to say nothing of the judge counseling the defendant that it is also not acceptable for him to teach his children that it is acceptable to use violence in the defense of religious beliefs. Instead, the judge gives Mr. Perce a lesson in Sharia law and drones on about the Muslim faith, inform everyone in the court room how strongly he embraces Islam, that the first amendment does not allow anyone ” to piss off other people and other cultures” and he was also insulted by Mr. Perce’s portrayal of Mohammed and the sign he carried.

This is a travesty. Not only did Judge Martin completely ignore video evidence, but a Police Officer who was at the scene also testified on Mr. Perce’s behalf, to which the Judge also dismissed by saying the officer didn’t give an accurate account or doesn’t give it any weight.

http://atheists.org/blog/2012/02/22/muslim-attacks-atheist-muslim-judge-dismisses-case-blames-victim



What. The. Fuck.
41 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Please let this be the last case this judge presides over n/t VWolf Feb 2012 #1
Fuck Moe and the horse he rode in on. Fuck that judge too. Lucky Luciano Feb 2012 #2
This judge should be barred from ever practicing law. Dawson Leery Feb 2012 #3
He's likely not a lawyer. rug Feb 2012 #9
Huh. Maybe there is something to the sharia-law scares I've been rolling my eyes at. ZombieHorde Feb 2012 #4
This sounds a lot like one of those 'sharia-law scares' you have been rolling you're eyes at. wandy Feb 2012 #7
I wonder if the Sharia law scaremongers will jump on this story arcane1 Feb 2012 #5
Had it been a christian, you betcha they would be all over it. cleanhippie Feb 2012 #6
The judge is so wrong on so many points... rexcat Feb 2012 #8
Your right to swing your fists ends at another person's nose. Sal316 Feb 2012 #10
What are you getting at? Your response is ambiguous. cleanhippie Feb 2012 #11
Seems pretty self explanatory to me. Sal316 Feb 2012 #12
Nice rationalization. cleanhippie Feb 2012 #13
Congrats on missing the point. Sal316 Feb 2012 #16
Congrats on not having one. cleanhippie Feb 2012 #22
Equivocation was unnecessary. darkstar3 Feb 2012 #14
Thanks for the suggestion. Sal316 Feb 2012 #17
Did you miss the fact that I recognized your bigger point, darkstar3 Feb 2012 #19
Yes I did. Sal316 Feb 2012 #29
You were doing fine until the second paragraph you wrote, then you fell off right field... Humanist_Activist Feb 2012 #15
I do see that. Sal316 Feb 2012 #18
Of course it was justified, its free speech, what about that is too difficult for you to understand? Humanist_Activist Feb 2012 #21
Goddamn right. darkstar3 Feb 2012 #23
Too many people value their myths more than they do people, its sick and evil, period. n/t Humanist_Activist Feb 2012 #24
It's like they believe a warped version of Evelyn Beatrice Hall's quote Rob H. Feb 2012 #27
No. Sal316 Feb 2012 #30
And just what were the responsibilities of the victim in this case? cleanhippie Feb 2012 #33
Seriously....if you have to ask... Sal316 Feb 2012 #35
Not that I disagree with you, but "being a douche" is not cleanhippie Feb 2012 #37
So I guess that means... Sal316 Feb 2012 #28
No, but I understand nuance... Humanist_Activist Feb 2012 #34
#facepalm Sal316 Feb 2012 #36
Think about it... SnakeEyes Feb 2012 #38
I think what Sal is getting at, is that religion deserves special consideration. cleanhippie Feb 2012 #39
If that were the case, then Blasphemy laws should be implemented. DUIC Feb 2012 #41
Link to TV news coverage of the story Boojatta Feb 2012 #20
other links/weird story wingzeroday Feb 2012 #25
You know what this reminds me of? 2ndAmForComputers Feb 2012 #26
This sheds an entirely new light on the case. And if true, needs to be investigated humblebum Feb 2012 #31
Has the Onion now moved into court rooms?? Angry Dragon Feb 2012 #32
There now seems to be strong doubt that the judge is indeed a Muslim. humblebum Feb 2012 #40
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Muslim Attacks Atheist. M...»Reply #0