Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
53. What for?
Mon Jan 20, 2014, 06:07 AM
Jan 2014

If norse mythology could have been reconciled to a 1800's-era understanding of how the universe works, would that have been a good thing?

Why?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I believe in both and think they can live together in peace. hrmjustin Jan 2014 #1
I think his point is that they can live side by side, just as you state. cbayer Jan 2014 #2
I can agree th at religion does not belong in science. hrmjustin Jan 2014 #3
Sunday school teacher here, and I agree. Of course it's "figurative." villager Jan 2014 #5
NDT has never been an enemy of religion cbayer Jan 2014 #6
Hell yes it should be kept out of science classrooms! villager Jan 2014 #9
I would like to see more religion taught in academic settings. cbayer Jan 2014 #10
Actually, I think science has its place in *religion* classes... villager Jan 2014 #11
How do you use science in your Sunday school classes? cbayer Jan 2014 #12
I agree that religion should not influence science. But religious people should learn more science Brettongarcia Jan 2014 #18
And in some cases, I think that scientists might benefit from learning more about religion. cbayer Jan 2014 #19
The opening stanzas of Genesis, for example, are a kind of poetic version of The Big Bang villager Jan 2014 #21
That's really interesting. cbayer Jan 2014 #23
Why... thanks! villager Jan 2014 #24
It's a great thing you are doing. cbayer Jan 2014 #26
Hmm... that's a thought villager Jan 2014 #29
What for? AtheistCrusader Jan 2014 #53
I don't understand what you are saying here. cbayer Jan 2014 #56
I'm asking why you think it's a good thing. AtheistCrusader Jan 2014 #60
As I explained, anything that encourages religious people, cbayer Jan 2014 #61
There are elements of Norse Mythology rooted in metaphor. AtheistCrusader Jan 2014 #62
I like Norse mythology. cbayer Jan 2014 #64
I also enjoyed all three mythologies. AtheistCrusader Jan 2014 #67
I was fortunate to have formal education in the mythologies at a very young age. cbayer Jan 2014 #70
Really!? longship Jan 2014 #28
If you are hung up on the stories being "true," in an absolute sense, I can see your problem villager Jan 2014 #30
I will grant you that but not that it matches the Big Bang in any way. Updated longship Jan 2014 #34
Enjoy your adamancy! villager Jan 2014 #41
The only claim I am making is that the Bible is not a science textbook. longship Jan 2014 #42
Speaking of straw men, I never made that claim! villager Jan 2014 #43
"Being 100% correct in all things, at all times, must be cool!" longship Jan 2014 #44
And again, I never said it was a science textbook. Are you that incapable of truly "hearing" people? villager Jan 2014 #46
There is both good and bad in the Bible. longship Jan 2014 #47
Thanks for a more thoughtful reply this time. There is indeed both good and bad in it villager Jan 2014 #48
I want to ditch my King James. longship Jan 2014 #49
Robert Alter is another good recent translator.... villager Jan 2014 #50
Rather curious... gcomeau Jan 2014 #58
curious which parts you mean specifically! villager Jan 2014 #59
Well, for example... gcomeau Jan 2014 #66
Land first, then water? cbayer Jan 2014 #68
Are you talking about the evolutionary timeline? Act_of_Reparation Jan 2014 #71
My misremembering, I am sure. cbayer Jan 2014 #72
There is no point in the history of the earth... gcomeau Jan 2014 #73
Well, I think the land/water issue is a matter of definition. cbayer Jan 2014 #74
in terms of life evolving, water was first, before land... villager Jan 2014 #69
No, they aren't a poetic version of the Big Bang, they are an inaccurate accounting... Humanist_Activist Jan 2014 #107
Religion should only be in religious classes. Myth literature can be taught as such on point Jan 2014 #78
I think there is general agreement on this site that religion should be cbayer Jan 2014 #79
Fine distinction. Religion in philosophy and religious class, but myth elsewhere on point Jan 2014 #81
You are free to call it whatever you want, but most of cbayer Jan 2014 #83
Ahh, but they do call it myth or fiction. Just ask the Greeks or Egyptians, or Vikings on point Jan 2014 #86
If current beliefs do become myths, and I can't argue that they won't cbayer Jan 2014 #87
So your argument is that people cannot live in a non delusional state? on point Jan 2014 #88
Uh oh...you used the word "delusional" Heddi Jan 2014 #89
Delusion by DEFINITION is belief in something that doesn't exist. on point Jan 2014 #93
Yes, but when you use it in the way you have, you must provide evidence that it doesn't exist. cbayer Jan 2014 #96
When people today believe they can walk on water, science shows their belief is false; delusional Brettongarcia Jan 2014 #97
That is correct. cbayer Jan 2014 #99
What an absurd, arbitrary demand. trotsky Jan 2014 #98
Most people do live in a non-delusional state. cbayer Jan 2014 #90
If your foundation point is that people need to understand the world around them on point Jan 2014 #91
That may be clear to you, but it's not demonstrable. cbayer Jan 2014 #92
Some people do need religious fantasy to cope with things and that helps them sometimes on point Jan 2014 #94
Dogma, dogma and more dogma. cbayer Jan 2014 #95
Faith is the antithesis of reason..it's really just that simple. skepticscott Jan 2014 #4
frankly, it makes their rationality suspect.... mike_c Jan 2014 #7
While scientists as a whole report less religiosity than the general public, cbayer Jan 2014 #8
even the PEW Research Center acknowledges the shortcomings of that poll.... mike_c Jan 2014 #13
There are always shortcomings when one is trying to measure religiosity, but cbayer Jan 2014 #16
a survey of the National Academy of Sciences found only 7% who professed belief.... mike_c Jan 2014 #22
Lol!! So you are making the case that NAS scientists are "greater" than other scientists? cbayer Jan 2014 #25
cbayer, this is unseemly.... mike_c Jan 2014 #27
Unseemly? Snark? cbayer Jan 2014 #31
I think you're trying to change the subject.... mike_c Jan 2014 #33
Not really, I just can't get past your extreme position and deal directly, or cbayer Jan 2014 #35
Well done, mike_c. trotsky Jan 2014 #75
Mike C: Thanks for your input! Brettongarcia Jan 2014 #54
But finally the Bible suggests problems with faith and belief. And tells us to "test everything" Brettongarcia Jan 2014 #20
K&R flying rabbit Jan 2014 #14
One of the bedrock foundations of science... krispos42 Jan 2014 #15
Hey Buddy!! How the heck have you been? cbayer Jan 2014 #17
Hello cbayer! krispos42 Jan 2014 #45
"Gungeon is quiet".... rdharma Jan 2014 #51
Hey, you can always appeal. krispos42 Jan 2014 #109
No thanks. I've seen your so-called "appeal" process. rdharma Jan 2014 #110
You mean where the regulars debated reinstatement and I followed their consensus? n/t krispos42 Jan 2014 #111
You do realize that 5 of your "regulars" that voiced their opinions.... rdharma Jan 2014 #112
So, if I am following this right, you have a girlfriend, a job and are staring school this week. cbayer Jan 2014 #55
Yeah.converting all my engineering school credits into some form of degree krispos42 Jan 2014 #108
I think they can, but thats just my opinion. Lobo27 Jan 2014 #32
I think there are many who share your position. cbayer Jan 2014 #37
Thanks for sharing about the book Lobo27 Jan 2014 #39
Let me know what you think of it. cbayer Jan 2014 #40
"Reconcilable"? demwing Jan 2014 #36
I believe that science is what God uses to make his/her miracles happen! TheDebbieDee Jan 2014 #38
Like oil and water! immoderate Jan 2014 #52
H. L. Mencken edhopper Jan 2014 #57
I disagree with that Prophet 451 Jan 2014 #63
I don't think he is saying that you can't do both. cbayer Jan 2014 #65
As a Jew, I believe that religion and science are not exclusive Gothmog Jan 2014 #76
Good reading. cbayer Jan 2014 #77
You may find this interesting Gothmog Jan 2014 #80
Interestingly, the only person I know well and personally who clings to the cbayer Jan 2014 #82
Have fun Gothmog Jan 2014 #84
I am a big fan of NDT. cbayer Jan 2014 #85
"There is no possibility whatsoever of reconciling science and theology, at least in Christendom. edhopper Jan 2014 #100
I love this guy! catbyte Jan 2014 #101
And he will have a new series this year. cbayer Jan 2014 #102
As Richard Feynman put it: "Shut up and calculate." DetlefK Jan 2014 #103
Your post got me to look up some of his quotes. cbayer Jan 2014 #104
Make no mistake edhopper Jan 2014 #105
I see that, but he also said (in the interview to which I think you refer) cbayer Jan 2014 #106
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Neil deGrasse Tyson: Scie...»Reply #53