Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Neil deGrasse Tyson: Science and Religion Are Not ‘Reconcilable,’ So Stop Trying [View all]AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)53. What for?
If norse mythology could have been reconciled to a 1800's-era understanding of how the universe works, would that have been a good thing?
Why?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
112 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Neil deGrasse Tyson: Science and Religion Are Not ‘Reconcilable,’ So Stop Trying [View all]
cbayer
Jan 2014
OP
I agree that religion should not influence science. But religious people should learn more science
Brettongarcia
Jan 2014
#18
And in some cases, I think that scientists might benefit from learning more about religion.
cbayer
Jan 2014
#19
The opening stanzas of Genesis, for example, are a kind of poetic version of The Big Bang
villager
Jan 2014
#21
I was fortunate to have formal education in the mythologies at a very young age.
cbayer
Jan 2014
#70
If you are hung up on the stories being "true," in an absolute sense, I can see your problem
villager
Jan 2014
#30
I will grant you that but not that it matches the Big Bang in any way. Updated
longship
Jan 2014
#34
And again, I never said it was a science textbook. Are you that incapable of truly "hearing" people?
villager
Jan 2014
#46
Thanks for a more thoughtful reply this time. There is indeed both good and bad in it
villager
Jan 2014
#48
No, they aren't a poetic version of the Big Bang, they are an inaccurate accounting...
Humanist_Activist
Jan 2014
#107
Religion should only be in religious classes. Myth literature can be taught as such
on point
Jan 2014
#78
Fine distinction. Religion in philosophy and religious class, but myth elsewhere
on point
Jan 2014
#81
Ahh, but they do call it myth or fiction. Just ask the Greeks or Egyptians, or Vikings
on point
Jan 2014
#86
Yes, but when you use it in the way you have, you must provide evidence that it doesn't exist.
cbayer
Jan 2014
#96
When people today believe they can walk on water, science shows their belief is false; delusional
Brettongarcia
Jan 2014
#97
If your foundation point is that people need to understand the world around them
on point
Jan 2014
#91
Some people do need religious fantasy to cope with things and that helps them sometimes
on point
Jan 2014
#94
a survey of the National Academy of Sciences found only 7% who professed belief....
mike_c
Jan 2014
#22
Lol!! So you are making the case that NAS scientists are "greater" than other scientists?
cbayer
Jan 2014
#25
But finally the Bible suggests problems with faith and belief. And tells us to "test everything"
Brettongarcia
Jan 2014
#20
You mean where the regulars debated reinstatement and I followed their consensus? n/t
krispos42
Jan 2014
#111
So, if I am following this right, you have a girlfriend, a job and are staring school this week.
cbayer
Jan 2014
#55