Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Neil deGrasse Tyson: Science and Religion Are Not ‘Reconcilable,’ So Stop Trying [View all]krispos42
(49,445 posts)108. Yeah.converting all my engineering school credits into some form of degree
And my kid is getting pretty bug. close to 90 pounds, about 4'3", and in 3rd grade.
I still want to come off and visit you on your boat... git your butt up here! I live by the ocean now, after all.
No excuses!
(transit via the Cape of Good Hope notwithstanding)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
112 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Neil deGrasse Tyson: Science and Religion Are Not ‘Reconcilable,’ So Stop Trying [View all]
cbayer
Jan 2014
OP
I agree that religion should not influence science. But religious people should learn more science
Brettongarcia
Jan 2014
#18
And in some cases, I think that scientists might benefit from learning more about religion.
cbayer
Jan 2014
#19
The opening stanzas of Genesis, for example, are a kind of poetic version of The Big Bang
villager
Jan 2014
#21
I was fortunate to have formal education in the mythologies at a very young age.
cbayer
Jan 2014
#70
If you are hung up on the stories being "true," in an absolute sense, I can see your problem
villager
Jan 2014
#30
I will grant you that but not that it matches the Big Bang in any way. Updated
longship
Jan 2014
#34
And again, I never said it was a science textbook. Are you that incapable of truly "hearing" people?
villager
Jan 2014
#46
Thanks for a more thoughtful reply this time. There is indeed both good and bad in it
villager
Jan 2014
#48
No, they aren't a poetic version of the Big Bang, they are an inaccurate accounting...
Humanist_Activist
Jan 2014
#107
Religion should only be in religious classes. Myth literature can be taught as such
on point
Jan 2014
#78
Fine distinction. Religion in philosophy and religious class, but myth elsewhere
on point
Jan 2014
#81
Ahh, but they do call it myth or fiction. Just ask the Greeks or Egyptians, or Vikings
on point
Jan 2014
#86
Yes, but when you use it in the way you have, you must provide evidence that it doesn't exist.
cbayer
Jan 2014
#96
When people today believe they can walk on water, science shows their belief is false; delusional
Brettongarcia
Jan 2014
#97
If your foundation point is that people need to understand the world around them
on point
Jan 2014
#91
Some people do need religious fantasy to cope with things and that helps them sometimes
on point
Jan 2014
#94
a survey of the National Academy of Sciences found only 7% who professed belief....
mike_c
Jan 2014
#22
Lol!! So you are making the case that NAS scientists are "greater" than other scientists?
cbayer
Jan 2014
#25
But finally the Bible suggests problems with faith and belief. And tells us to "test everything"
Brettongarcia
Jan 2014
#20
You mean where the regulars debated reinstatement and I followed their consensus? n/t
krispos42
Jan 2014
#111
So, if I am following this right, you have a girlfriend, a job and are staring school this week.
cbayer
Jan 2014
#55