Religion
In reply to the discussion: Pope Francis calls for flexibility, patience as he opens talks on church teaching [View all]MellowDem
(5,018 posts)into religion. Hence my first-hand experience and understanding of religion. Religion is not so complex or diverse as to not be understood or criticized as a whole. It has a definition and foundation, one that is harmful in many ways. I know a common apologist argument is to make words and concepts so vague as to be meaningless, and in that way protect them from criticism, but I've always found that to be a substitute for discussion, a dodge.
My view of religion is not dogmatic or rigid. Neither is my view of conservatism. It's an informed opinion. You saying it is doesn't make it so.
Given that religion is based on faith and faith encourages false beliefs, which can be harmful in a lot of ways IMHO, I don't think my dislike of religion is dogmatic or rigid, but based on a good reason. If you find that critique dogmatic or rigid, then look up the definitions of those two words, and explain why.
I'll give you some hints. This is my opinion, based on preferences, so I'm not making a truth claim. And I'm willing to change my opinion if anyone can come up with good reasons.