Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Religion Doesn’t Require Bigotry, And Don’t Let Anyone Claim Otherwise [View all]AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)44. A metaphor for... a third party that injures you and you should love it anyway?
"The fact that you don't understand people that interpret things differently than you is an issue for you, I guess."
No, I think there's genuinely something problematic about someone that looks at a murder scene and the only thing that occurs to them is that the blood of the victim is a lovely shade of red, and isn't that a wonderful thing to have been able to see. Because that's what Job illustrates. Torture and murder, and one of the victims still loving the murderer, and then being rewarded for it. I have a problem with people who refuse to see torture and murder for what it is. Whistling 'always look on the bright side of your life' when standing knee deep in blood doesn't imply anything about ME. I call blood, blood. Murder is murder. Torture is torture. Not just easily ignored bookends around a lovely life lesson.
"You obviously see really horrific things where others see stories that inspire them or make them reflect in a way that they hadn't before."
No, I see murder where the story describes murder. Period. I see torture where the story describes torture. I see horrific things where horrific things are described. Do you deny that it describes torture and murder? That murder and torture are objectively wrong? I can point it out for you if you need. Do you deny that Job profits from his Stockholm-like devotion to the torturer and murderer? The story actually alludes to a concept by a man I greatly respect, Frederick Douglass;
"The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress. Find out just what people will submit to, and you have found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them; and these will continue until they are resisted with either words or blows, or with both."
Except of course, 'god' is supposedly the good guy in the story. You know. The murderer. The torturer. The genocidal maniac. The tyrant.
"Do you really want everyone to have exactly the same experiences as you?" No, but there are some very objective conditions, like murder, that I'm surprised you seem to think there's so very much wiggle room on, for extracting truth, beauty and justice.
Ecclesiastes is a nihilist fallacy from stem to stern. Also suggests that god steals wealth from non-believers, to give to believers, and that's just fine and dandy.
"The sleep of a laborer is sweet, whether they eat little or much, but as for the rich, their abundance permits them no sleep."
Hahaha yeah, and if I was a rich man, that's the bullshit I'd be telling poor people too. Oh yeah, nah, you guys don't want to do this, woe is me, as I sleep in my cotton jacquard, 280 TC sheets, man. Full belly. Entertainment of any sort on demand. Sucks to be me.
That's exactly the line of bullshit a 1%'er will feed you. And it ends on a high note of 'all you humans suck'.
Great choice there. Real counterpoint to Job. 1:2 and 1:10 can be answered with "nanos gigantum humeris insidentes" and "germ theory" respectively.
No, I think there's genuinely something problematic about someone that looks at a murder scene and the only thing that occurs to them is that the blood of the victim is a lovely shade of red, and isn't that a wonderful thing to have been able to see. Because that's what Job illustrates. Torture and murder, and one of the victims still loving the murderer, and then being rewarded for it. I have a problem with people who refuse to see torture and murder for what it is. Whistling 'always look on the bright side of your life' when standing knee deep in blood doesn't imply anything about ME. I call blood, blood. Murder is murder. Torture is torture. Not just easily ignored bookends around a lovely life lesson.
"You obviously see really horrific things where others see stories that inspire them or make them reflect in a way that they hadn't before."
No, I see murder where the story describes murder. Period. I see torture where the story describes torture. I see horrific things where horrific things are described. Do you deny that it describes torture and murder? That murder and torture are objectively wrong? I can point it out for you if you need. Do you deny that Job profits from his Stockholm-like devotion to the torturer and murderer? The story actually alludes to a concept by a man I greatly respect, Frederick Douglass;
"The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress. Find out just what people will submit to, and you have found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them; and these will continue until they are resisted with either words or blows, or with both."
Except of course, 'god' is supposedly the good guy in the story. You know. The murderer. The torturer. The genocidal maniac. The tyrant.
"Do you really want everyone to have exactly the same experiences as you?" No, but there are some very objective conditions, like murder, that I'm surprised you seem to think there's so very much wiggle room on, for extracting truth, beauty and justice.
Ecclesiastes is a nihilist fallacy from stem to stern. Also suggests that god steals wealth from non-believers, to give to believers, and that's just fine and dandy.
"The sleep of a laborer is sweet, whether they eat little or much, but as for the rich, their abundance permits them no sleep."
Hahaha yeah, and if I was a rich man, that's the bullshit I'd be telling poor people too. Oh yeah, nah, you guys don't want to do this, woe is me, as I sleep in my cotton jacquard, 280 TC sheets, man. Full belly. Entertainment of any sort on demand. Sucks to be me.
That's exactly the line of bullshit a 1%'er will feed you. And it ends on a high note of 'all you humans suck'.
Great choice there. Real counterpoint to Job. 1:2 and 1:10 can be answered with "nanos gigantum humeris insidentes" and "germ theory" respectively.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
88 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Religion Doesn’t Require Bigotry, And Don’t Let Anyone Claim Otherwise [View all]
cbayer
Mar 2014
OP
That is correct. And the small bit that religious affiliation gives to some pales in
cbayer
Mar 2014
#87
Thanks for repeating what I just said, and completely missing the point.
AtheistCrusader
Mar 2014
#33
You have read the bible and not seen anything about love, compassion and justice?
cbayer
Mar 2014
#37
Sure, I particularly enjoyed the story of Job, wherein god killed his entire family
AtheistCrusader
Mar 2014
#38
A metaphor for... a third party that injures you and you should love it anyway?
AtheistCrusader
Mar 2014
#44
Good analogy. I do think there are times that you need to love those that hurt you.
cbayer
Mar 2014
#45
What about loving people who intentionally hurt you just to see how much they can hurt you before
AtheistCrusader
Mar 2014
#46
How does one interpret a story about torture and murder so that it doesn't include
AtheistCrusader
Mar 2014
#52
I love how defensively subjective these bible passages can be made to be
AtheistCrusader
Mar 2014
#63
Problem is, religion often claims to be "holy" and PERFECT. So if we see ANY bigotry and genocide?
Brettongarcia
Mar 2014
#79
I've encountered enough so called progressive christians that 'love the sinner but hate the sin'
AtheistCrusader
Mar 2014
#49
Yeah, and it's a bigoted manner to say the KKK is a pack of bigoted vermin. Sure.
AtheistCrusader
Mar 2014
#53
Yes, you did equate religious believers with members of the Ku Klux Klan
Fortinbras Armstrong
Mar 2014
#69
Yeah, go play by yourself if all you can do is mischaracterize a post that's right there for every
AtheistCrusader
Mar 2014
#75
Most religion is based on "faith"; which means believing without evidence. Which is bigotry
Brettongarcia
Mar 2014
#72