Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Silent3

(15,210 posts)
Mon Feb 27, 2012, 06:44 PM Feb 2012

What are the various flavors of "let's all get along" theology? [View all]

These are the varieties that I can think of:


(1) What I believe is true, but my God is a nice God (or my gods are nice gods) and as long as you're a good person, you'll be OK.

(1a) What I believe is true, but my God is a nice God (or my gods are nice gods) and as long as you're a good person, you'll be OK. You won't ascend to as high a level as I do/won't be as rewarded in the afterlife/won't enjoy the full spiritual benefits I enjoy -- but you'll be OK.

(1b) What I believe is true, but my God is a nice God (or my gods are nice gods) and as long as you're a good person, you'll be OK -- as long as you believe in something. Lacking belief won't cut it.


(2) You're at a different level/stage of "spiritual development" than I am. But that's OK (great struggling and effort expended to avoid sounding condescending and/or like making a value judgement). I was once where you are now.

(2a) ...and there are other people at higher levels than me.

(2b) ...and I'm sure there are other-worldly spiritual beings advanced beyond me (but I don't know of any here on earth above my level).


(3) What I believe is true, what you believe is true... it's all true!

(3a) ...it's just "different aspects" of the truth. Let me tell you about the blind men and the elephant...

(3b) ...your truth is your truth, my truth is my truth, and, well, let's not get into thinking too deeply about how that works out in any sort of coherent epistemology.


(4) Let's just leave it at "let's all get along" and not ask any complicated questions that might mess that up.


(5) I'm right, you're wrong, but I'm going to keep quiet about that, or gloss over any possible conflicts with diplomatic language, because I want us all to get along. As far as you know, I'm "happy for you" and the comfort your beliefs bring you, and that's that.


(6) Something super-erudite and spiritual and wise that's way better than any of the above options, but I can't possibly explain it to anyone who...

(6a) ...isn't ready to understand.

(6b) ...doesn't want to understand.


Can anyone think of some more?

27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Not just brilliant idea for a post but hysterical. snagglepuss Feb 2012 #1
I don't believe much of anything and I don't give a shit if you do. Warpy Feb 2012 #2
And if you see your country edhopper Feb 2012 #4
Different issue, entirely Warpy Feb 2012 #7
Except its not. cleanhippie Feb 2012 #10
The point of the thread was how people coexist, not how they disagree. GliderGuider Feb 2012 #12
Not a red herring edhopper Feb 2012 #8
The very act of characterizing beliefs as "what anyone uses to get through... Silent3 Feb 2012 #11
Sorry, but what's wrong with this, exactly?: mr blur Feb 2012 #16
Of course it doesn't make one guilty of "bullying" GliderGuider Feb 2012 #17
Anyone who considers that "random example" bullying doesn't get... Silent3 Feb 2012 #18
OK, so we're talking just about Internet behaviour then? GliderGuider Feb 2012 #19
That's dancing around the point of the OP, however. Silent3 Feb 2012 #22
I've generally stopped trying to reconcile others' opinions with my own. GliderGuider Feb 2012 #23
I don't even get how that can work. Silent3 Feb 2012 #26
Deep and shallow tama Feb 2012 #27
Most of the bullying tama Feb 2012 #24
(7) ... we disagree but don't be a dick. rug Feb 2012 #3
8) We have more in common than we do differences cbayer Feb 2012 #5
I never suggested that anything was wrong with getting along. Silent3 Feb 2012 #9
(6c) ...isn't a member of my ethnic group. FarCenter Feb 2012 #6
9. "Thank you for sharing. Have a nice day." nt GliderGuider Feb 2012 #13
HA HA, but I have never heard, seen or known a theologian who takes that stance. Thats my opinion Feb 2012 #14
You don't have to be a theologian to have a theology. Silent3 Feb 2012 #15
You don't have to be a scientist to make a cogent statement about science--but it might help. nt Thats my opinion Feb 2012 #20
Is that your way of diplomatically avoiding the issue that the muddled masses... Silent3 Feb 2012 #21
Very good tama Feb 2012 #25
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»What are the various flav...»Reply #0