Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

struggle4progress

(126,698 posts)
28. Maybe personal experiences play a role
Thu Mar 27, 2014, 10:18 PM
Mar 2014

Over the years, I have heard plenty of conservatives express views about how different genders should dress and groom. At one time, where I lived, there was controversy about whether women could wear "pants suits" or whether they had to wear dresses. Former hippies like me remember the rage long-haired men inspired in some quarters -- and the fundamentalists who insisted the Pauline epistles required us to have short hair: some of us had fun pointing out to them that the standard depictions of Jesus showed him with long hair, as it was a sure way to trigger incoherent blather

Since then I've always wondered about demands for conformity, based on interpretations of the Bible in combination with claims that the Bible is "inerrant and infallible." A major use made of belief in an "inerrant infallible" scripture is that the person, claiming to possess this "inerrant infallible" text, implicitly claims also to possess an "inerrant infallible" reading of the text, and then explicitly claims enormous authority for his/her personal views, demanding our obeisance to those personal views

It may be unfair, but I have difficulty escaping this personal history and this psychological analysis, when reading the story of the little girl. The school's later response, involving matters such as alleged confusion of other students, caused by the little girl's use of the girl's rest room, does not particularly encourage me to change my mind: I would think the adults should pleasantly explain to the other girls that different people look different, and then tell the little brat-demons to straighten up or else

On the other hand, when I've had a document notarized, nobody has ever inquired into the document contents or my religious beliefs. Knief says she never had trouble at the bank before and says the notary in question "went to find another notary .. to .. do the authentications," but she also describes this as "the worst slight I have ever received." Perhaps Knief is a sheltered waif, and the fact that one notary went to find another to notarize Knief's paperwork really IS the worst slight Knief ever received -- but I suspect the claim will strike most people as a bit histronic

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

A certain amount of that might be disdain for Silverman el_bryanto Mar 2014 #1
Apples and oranges... TreasonousBastard Mar 2014 #2
Not comparing the outcomes. Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #3
The school is on the record for what it did... TreasonousBastard Mar 2014 #6
Don't bullshit me Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #8
They objected to her not being... TreasonousBastard Mar 2014 #12
That quotation and others from their press release Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #13
And I wanted this as a separate discussion. "Invented crap to screw her up"? Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #4
Yeah. That's about it. TreasonousBastard Mar 2014 #5
So if I called your religious beliefs that Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #7
Atheists do call theists beliefs crap all the time, don't they? el_bryanto Mar 2014 #9
And that goes without comment from the theists? Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #10
This is a line I've heard before - that if I am going to be a theist i have to be respectful of all el_bryanto Mar 2014 #14
I think it is a little different perspective than that. Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #15
I've had that suggested to me several times - the leave the religion forum line el_bryanto Mar 2014 #18
Not what I'm saying Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #19
See you say that in the lightest and most benign way possible el_bryanto Mar 2014 #20
I love the circular reasoning found primarily with those... TreasonousBastard Mar 2014 #16
That's not circular Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #17
It's quite round... TreasonousBastard Mar 2014 #27
So by your definition Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #32
Once upon a time, okasha Mar 2014 #25
Nice strawman Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #31
Well, then, assuming your observation is correct (which it isn't), does it offend you? rug Mar 2014 #37
Delusion, mental illness, okasha Mar 2014 #24
And those words are used here to describe fundamentalist beliefs Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #33
You really can't have it both ways. okasha Mar 2014 #43
Sorry. That was a typo. Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #46
No, bullshit is rebutted pretty uniformly. There's just been a lot more from you lately. rug Mar 2014 #11
No, bullshit is propounded pretty uniformly. There's just been a lot more from you lately. mr blur Mar 2014 #21
QED rug Mar 2014 #22
Every time someone in this forum offers an interpretation of a Biblical passage, okasha Mar 2014 #23
Wait-and-see is a great response Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #34
This is just the half of it! goldent Mar 2014 #26
Maybe personal experiences play a role struggle4progress Mar 2014 #28
I completely understand that and believe the girl Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #35
Let me try again: "Amanda Knief may have trouble telling the truth." Is that better? Some links: struggle4progress Mar 2014 #44
Except you're wrong Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #47
(1) She claimed NJ has no law preventing notary discrimination against atheists; the ACLU said, no, struggle4progress Mar 2014 #49
NO. Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #51
That is a fascinating distinction. Is it your view that no one may ever, under any circumstances, struggle4progress Mar 2014 #56
I think more needs to be done so bigots Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #57
Is there a common ground among atheists, theists and all those along that broad spectrum? pinto Mar 2014 #29
The author of the first link in your OP seems badly confused struggle4progress Mar 2014 #30
I'll be honest with you right now. Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #36
Really? And exactly what "bigger issue" did you think that link raises? struggle4progress Mar 2014 #38
I'm not going to self delete Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #39
If you have concerns about how the group is hosted, feel free to start a thread about that struggle4progress Mar 2014 #40
Perhaps I already did. n/t Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #41
It's odd that you feel compelled to mention me twice in this post while claiming to ignore me. rug Mar 2014 #42
What are you saying here? hrmjustin Mar 2014 #45
Seriously, dude. I really want to like you. Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #48
Well you will notice I didn't question the story about the teller. hrmjustin Mar 2014 #50
But this isn't about digging deeper Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #52
Maybe it was because of who was making the claim in the teller story. hrmjustin Mar 2014 #53
And why is that? Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #54
I don't know. hrmjustin Mar 2014 #55
Religious people, particularly Christians are given the benefit of the doubt when it comes... Humanist_Activist Mar 2014 #58
It's hard to credit anyone who routinely considers a god to be a colander. rug Mar 2014 #59
I have had exactly the opposite experience Fortinbras Armstrong Mar 2014 #60
Why do none of us believe skepticscott Mar 2014 #61
Here is a link to the actual post Fortinbras Armstrong Mar 2014 #65
Wow, exactly as predicted skepticscott Mar 2014 #66
Gosh, I complain TWICE or even THREE TIMES about how it was acceptable Fortinbras Armstrong Mar 2014 #73
To quote you skepticscott Mar 2014 #74
I notice that you don't give a damn about the double standard Fortinbras Armstrong Mar 2014 #76
Oh for fuck's sake Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #81
No, I am bringing up the fact that Skepticscott FALSELY called me a liar Fortinbras Armstrong Mar 2014 #85
Yawn skepticscott Mar 2014 #86
Hey, if you want to do this in private, get a room Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #87
OK Fortinbras Armstrong Mar 2014 #88
There have been several insults hurled by boths sides that have been hidden and left. hrmjustin Mar 2014 #64
I think it should also be noted LostOne4Ever Mar 2014 #62
Because no two people woud lie against one person, never happened in the history of mankind and Leontius Mar 2014 #63
Didn't say that LostOne4Ever Mar 2014 #75
I think you should have used the word hyperbole Leontius Mar 2014 #79
Yes, because we all know atheists lie. Right? Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #84
What a maroon. Leontius Mar 2014 #90
What a twit. Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #91
Sorry Bugs tops whatever thanks for playing. Leontius Mar 2014 #92
Bugs is great. Doesn't top Monty Python. Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #93
I really miss when PBS was worth watching. Leontius Mar 2014 #94
I think the reason for the differing responses okasha Mar 2014 #67
She got kicked out of the school Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #68
You just said it yourself. okasha Mar 2014 #69
What she was kicked out of school for Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #71
No, I don't say that about the ACLU. okasha Mar 2014 #72
I know you didn't say that about the ACLU Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #82
There's a huge difference between bullying a child and having someone else notarizing your name. rug Mar 2014 #70
what bank? Deep13 Mar 2014 #77
See this thread: struggle4progress Mar 2014 #78
I did link to both threads in the OP Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #83
Notarize the document or turn in the notary seal. Deep13 Mar 2014 #80
I don't think much of Silverman and co. AtheistCrusader Mar 2014 #89
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Is there a double standar...»Reply #28