Religion
In reply to the discussion: I have a problem with a Religion host [View all]struggle4progress
(125,327 posts)on Religion group hosting, which you may find in the archives, would allow for such removal if the other hosts agreed
But I think you deliberately misread and misrepresent my posts
My exchange with you occurs in this subthread #8, in which you find it funny that a man drowned and also find it funny that another man fell off a cliff. I interpret that as ugly schadenfreud and remark that in severe and chronic cases of schadenfreude, results can be rather unattractive. This seems to me an appropriate response to someone who snickers about a drowning and a fatal fall: if you're free to snicker, I'm free to warn you what road I think you're headed down
My exchange with AtheistCrusader occurs in this subthread #66, in which AtheistCrusader somehow attempts to tie the story of two boys drowned in a bathtub to the story of Abraham and Isaac. This IMO is bottom-dragging for a reaction: it has nothing whatsoever to do with any details of the story under discussion in the thread; it is designed to malign various people based on a grotesque misrepresentation of an ancient story; and I responded to that. The Religion group, by agreement of its participants, is hosted with a rather light hand; and so bottom-dragging for a reaction is common here; but it seems to me that there can be little complaint if one's bottom-dragging for a reaction, by grotesque misrepresentation of other people's beliefs, produces a reaction objecting to such grotesque misrepresentation