Religion
In reply to the discussion: I have a problem with a Religion host [View all]thucythucy
(9,042 posts)It means if you post something meant to be provocative and taken to be insensitive, you just might get something along those lines in return.
"Gloating" was precisely what you were doing, which you'll see if you follow your own link. "Flamebait"--yup. A fairly obvious attempt to provoke a response, and then going off in high dudgeon once it happens. As a veteran of the DU gender wars, I recognize the phenomenon. And no, I don't think he called you a Nazi, though it's rather implied that your delight at the suffering of others is hardly the stuff liberal humanists are made of. Personally I always cringe when references to Nazism, Hitler, Munich, Stalin, Pol Pot etc. are made, unless for a genuine historical point. But it's hardly the first time it's happened at DU, and I doubt it will be the last. I also cringe when people express amusement at the death of perfect strangers, who have never done them any personal harm, but I tend also not to start entire OPs about that either.
As for my not having a dog in this fight, by that I mean I'm an agnostic--don't know if there is or isn't a god or gods, and doubt that if he/she/them/it exists that he/she/them/it would care whether I believe or not. So I'm not carrying water for people who believe, or people who don't. I'm commenting only on the matter of your posts at the link, and your pretty crude attempt to provoke a controversy here.
If you want to pursue your vendetta of course that's your prerogative. To my eyes, the link you provide doesn't speak well for you, and this whole OP makes you seem petty and thin-skinned, but you obviously disagree.
Tant pis.
Tschuss.