Religion
In reply to the discussion: I have a problem with a Religion host [View all]TM99
(8,352 posts)Snark substituting for rational communication.
If you are not making proscriptions as to what should or should not offend people, why are you even commenting in this thread? It is all subjective and personal after all, right?
Why did you interject yourself into a this sub-thread in order to communicate to me about offensive Nazi allusions and implied comments? That is hardly consistent is it?
So if offense is subjective, then what? The objective standards of the community have thus far not agreed that it was offensive enough to warrant censure. So what now? I already asked this of the OP but apparently you are not actually reading my replies in this thread?
Whether I think it was implied or not is ultimately irrelevant, and I have made that abundantly clear in all of my replies in this thread. The OP believes it subjectively. The groups have split off apparently defending their own which is not surprising giving group dynamics and psychology. Objectively at this point, the post stands. The group has not ousted S4P. The OP made this discussion a part of the community. The community is speaking and not agreeing. So now what?
And what the hell does your linked reply have a whit to do with me? Can you see any place where I actually replied in that thread? I am sorry but I was not the alerter nor did I serve on that jury.