Religion
In reply to the discussion: I have a problem with a Religion host [View all]skepticscott
(13,029 posts)Your whole self-righteous rant is just a rehash of the same complaints that one clique here was making a year or more ago, that led them, as already explained, to push for the formation of the Interfaith Group, so that they'd have a place for the type of "civil" and "respectful" discussion that they claimed to want. We've already been wearied with endless gripes about threads "devolving into anti-theist snarks" and a hundred variations of that, and I have no desire to hear them all over again now that complainers such as you have an alternative. I also have no desire to educate you on why atheists might want to post in this group..been there, done that too
many, many times for many, many clueless people.
And no, despite your uninformed dismissal, the Interfaith Group is not "just for those of faith", and it is not "no different than here, at least with regards to the anti-theists". Here's their statement of purpose:
A safe haven that provides opportunities for people of all faiths, spiritual leanings and non-belief to discuss religious topics and events in a positive and civil manner, with an emphasis on tolerance. Criticisms of individual beliefs or non-belief, or debates about the existence of higher power(s) are not appropriate in this group.
Your excuses for not going there fall flat. They welcome atheists, agnostics, ignostics, bignostics, fignostics, pignostics or whatever you want to call yourself, as long as Group rules are adhered to. So here's your challenge. You claim that "an interesting discussion on religion and Scottish independence" can be had. That thread has already been started in the Interfaith Group, so let's see you make it into the kind of discussion you claim you want. I promise that none of the people you're whining about will interfere. Put your money where your mouth is. Would you rather be as snarky as you upbraid others for being (at which you're succeeding, btw), or would you rather be part of the change you advocate?