Religion
In reply to the discussion: I have a problem with a Religion host [View all]LostOne4Ever
(9,733 posts)Because I am constantly trying to re-asses my own biases as much as I can.
Just trying to make my original post to this thread I was constantly looking over the OP and the linked threads trying to decide what I really thought vs my own biases.
Did I really feel that the post was over the line or was I allowing my bias in favor of GM side color my vision. There is a big difference between merely noting that triblism exists and actually working against it.
If one is not careful one can end up having a counter-bias against one's own "tribe" in the pursuit of trying to be objective.
This can be seen in some of the "I'm an atheists, BUT..." articles we see in this forum. Those type of articles in particular im finding I have less and less tolerance for as they unintentionally promote the "all atheists are assholes" stereotype. Throw in tribalism and you can have the other tribe pouncing on the comments going "see see one of their own even admit the stereotype is true!!!"
I try my best to call out posters who go over the line (atheist and theist alike) as I see them, but often will sit back and think long and hard before doing so to make sure im not engaging in either bias or counter bias for my own group and making sure my words can't be used or twisted to further a stereotype I am trying very hard to disprove.
Sometimes, I just can't tell if im blinded by my own double standards and biases. From there, I figure that if I can't tell for sure if my objection is due to bias then my basis for the objection must be pretty weak and I choose, to paraphrase Mark Twain, keep my mouth shut and let everyone think I am a fool rather than open it and remove all doubt.