I have a problem with a Religion host

[muriel_volestrangler]

512. And again, you show your blindness, wilful or otherwise, to why you were offensive

The second sentence, of course, is standard Rabbinical interpretation of the story. The first clause of the first sentence is historically accurate. Presumably the second clause causes the offense. But it seems to me, that if someone who does not subscribe to a religion, insists on misrepresenting views of those who do subscribe to that religion, in order to score points, that is ugly, and it does not seem to me that those who engage in such trawling for a reaction have much complaint if a reaction results

The first clause may be historically accurate, but it's a red herring. The Abraham and Isaac story appears in the Christian Old Testament as well as the Jewish scriptures. The god it describes telling a parent to kill their child is the same god of the woman in the OP. There's nothing in what AC said that is about Judaism. What's more, AC did not claim that any religion commands child-sacrifice; he described a well-known biblical story of 'God' commanding it - and had acknowledged, without prompting, that there's then a second message saying 'don't do it'.

" if someone who does not subscribe to a religion, insists on misrepresenting views of those who do subscribe to that religion, in order to score points, that is ugly"

They did not misrepresent any view. They described a bible story. The misrepresentation here is what you say. And you are doing it time after time. It is ugly, and this is why we cannot trust you as a host. If you think that someone referencing part of the bible gives you carte blanche to call them anti-semitic, just because that story paints God in a bad light, your judgement is unsound.