Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It's conflatng atheism with an intent to "Combat Religion". rug Apr 2014 #1
Where? MellowDem Apr 2014 #3
"Coming Out as an Atheist May Be the Most Powerful Way to Combat Religion" rug Apr 2014 #5
Nowhere does that conflate atheism with an intent to combat religion... MellowDem Apr 2014 #6
"The Most Powerful Way to Combat Religion May Be Coming Out as an Atheist." rug Apr 2014 #8
And it still doesn't conflate atheism... MellowDem Apr 2014 #10
Of course it does. You "combat" religion with secularism, not atheism. rug Apr 2014 #13
It does make no claims... MellowDem Apr 2014 #20
Then a claim that atheism combats religion is nonsense. rug Apr 2014 #22
The claim is that coming out as atheist combats religion MellowDem Apr 2014 #23
Because . . . . rug Apr 2014 #24
because... MellowDem Apr 2014 #28
Except announcing one's atheism does not deny "social consent" to relgion. rug Apr 2014 #29
Have you read the book? AtheistCrusader Apr 2014 #47
No, it camw out last month. Have you? rug Apr 2014 #48
I have not. AtheistCrusader Apr 2014 #50
That must still sting. rug Apr 2014 #52
Not at all. There is simplicity in consistency that appeals to me. AtheistCrusader Apr 2014 #53
There is a difference. I pointed out a problem with its premise. Whereas you posted: rug Apr 2014 #56
When you objected, I clarified. AtheistCrusader Apr 2014 #61
I would have said chervilant Apr 2014 #59
Um no. AtheistCrusader Apr 2014 #42
That assumes that atheism, per se, "combats religion". It doesn't. rug Apr 2014 #49
By 'combats religion' I read that to mean AtheistCrusader Apr 2014 #51
Again, there's nothing about atheism that compels "de-converting people from religion". rug Apr 2014 #54
Of course. AtheistCrusader Apr 2014 #55
Therefore, the premise of the book is false. rug Apr 2014 #57
Is it? AtheistCrusader Apr 2014 #60
In your, NSHO Lordquinton Apr 2014 #130
so spreading the atheist word is ok Niceguy1 Apr 2014 #2
They aren't equal... MellowDem Apr 2014 #4
they are both persnal beliefs Niceguy1 Apr 2014 #7
Who said it was inherently evil to believe a certain way? MellowDem Apr 2014 #9
faith iant politics Niceguy1 Apr 2014 #14
Faith informs politics skepticscott Apr 2014 #16
decilas advocate. .... Niceguy1 Apr 2014 #25
It's not about allowing people to form opinions skepticscott Apr 2014 #26
What skepticscott is apparently trying to say Fortinbras Armstrong Apr 2014 #35
Don't hurt yourself, Stretch. Best let me explain. skepticscott Apr 2014 #39
In other words, as I said Fortinbras Armstrong Apr 2014 #72
As I said, don't hurt yourself thinking about it too much skepticscott Apr 2014 #92
I asked you if I had stated what you said correctly, and you repeated it in slightly different words Fortinbras Armstrong Apr 2014 #141
My exact words were right there skepticscott Apr 2014 #143
Yes, they were Fortinbras Armstrong Apr 2014 #149
Religion engages in politics... MellowDem Apr 2014 #21
So believing in God is bad? Fortinbras Armstrong Apr 2014 #36
Not "bad"... MellowDem Apr 2014 #64
In other words, "bad" Fortinbras Armstrong Apr 2014 #68
As in not "evil" MellowDem Apr 2014 #71
I agree that there is a lot of potential harm in believing false things, cbayer Apr 2014 #79
Whether religion is only a negative force... MellowDem Apr 2014 #83
I've read this post half a dozen times and I still have no idea what it means. cbayer Apr 2014 #88
Your conflating opinions on questions with no objective answer... MellowDem Apr 2014 #90
Some of us think that the truth should be superior skepticscott Apr 2014 #12
But we believers think that we hold to the truth Fortinbras Armstrong Apr 2014 #37
When someone's "truth" involves demonstrable falsehoods and nonsense skepticscott Apr 2014 #40
Because you can't demonstrate any evidence for your incredible claims. AtheistCrusader Apr 2014 #43
But "God does not exist" is also an extraordinary claim Fortinbras Armstrong Apr 2014 #70
Is saying "Unicorns don't exist" an extraordinary claim? immoderate Apr 2014 #76
Ah, but I say 'I do not believe god exists.' AtheistCrusader Apr 2014 #85
Zeus does not exist. JNelson6563 Apr 2014 #106
silence -- apparently only claiming that the christian deity does not exist Warren Stupidity Apr 2014 #113
apparently only claiming that the christian deity does not exist AlbertCat Apr 2014 #136
I assume you either still believe that Santa Claus exists skepticscott Apr 2014 #117
That's the sort of thing that gets you atheists disliked by believers: Fortinbras Armstrong Apr 2014 #142
You're right, actually skepticscott Apr 2014 #144
Thank you for that unabashed piece of atheist bigotry Fortinbras Armstrong Apr 2014 #148
And I can always count on you skepticscott Apr 2014 #157
This message was self-deleted by its author LTX Apr 2014 #162
Well, when you say bigoted things, Fortinbras Armstrong Apr 2014 #167
Do you honestly think that comparing your god to Santa Claus is "bigotry"? trotsky Apr 2014 #169
It's more stupidity than bigotry. rug Apr 2014 #172
Really Fortinbras Armstrong Apr 2014 #174
That comparison is happening in your own mind only, FA. trotsky Apr 2014 #176
Skepticscott was the one making the comparison between God and Santa Claus, not me Fortinbras Armstrong Apr 2014 #179
That would be falsely framing Skeptiscott's statement/claim. AtheistCrusader Apr 2014 #185
Bingo. n/t trotsky Apr 2014 #187
Sorry if you don't like the fact skepticscott Apr 2014 #189
And the best part is AtheistCrusader Apr 2014 #193
Perhaps a better example than Santa Clause xfundy Apr 2014 #204
Post removed Post removed Apr 2014 #205
Well, it seems our friend crashed and burned. AGAIN! cleanhippie Apr 2014 #210
It's hard not to skepticscott Apr 2014 #212
How many hides is that now for him? cleanhippie Apr 2014 #213
Not likely skepticscott Apr 2014 #214
Wow, he now has as many hidden posts as you. rug Apr 2014 #215
My hide count is equal to the actual number of supernatural gods that exist. AtheistCrusader Apr 2014 #216
That would be super-convenient for you, wouldn't it? AtheistCrusader Apr 2014 #265
The notion that humans are "born atheists" LTX Apr 2014 #262
Attractive and EASILY ACQUIRED. AtheistCrusader Apr 2014 #264
That's actually a good way to succinctly put it -- LTX Apr 2014 #266
Your conclusory propositions about "unfalsifiable claims" being bad is scientism on steroids. LTX Apr 2014 #32
I would be FUCKING THRILLED AtheistCrusader Apr 2014 #44
Most do, in my (strictly anecdotal) experience. LTX Apr 2014 #63
No they don't... MellowDem Apr 2014 #66
In response to your questions, LTX Apr 2014 #74
The Bible, Torah, and Koran MellowDem Apr 2014 #78
Your literalism and definitional parameters are noted. LTX Apr 2014 #86
Literalism? You mean reasoning and logic? MellowDem Apr 2014 #89
No, I mean literalism. It's not a particularly difficult concept. LTX Apr 2014 #94
So you defend the Bible and religion, by saying it is not literally true? Brettongarcia Apr 2014 #132
My interest is in the nature, persistence, and role of religious thinking LTX Apr 2014 #146
Generally allegories etc. might be said to be half true; but inaccurate in any literal way, usually. Brettongarcia Apr 2014 #170
Humans are metaphor machines. LTX Apr 2014 #171
Sure; George Lackoff wrote Metaphors We Live By; I used that in my PhD dissertation Brettongarcia Apr 2014 #199
Well, this must explain why the Catholic Church spends millions lobbying AtheistCrusader Apr 2014 #82
I don't know anything at all about the Catholic church's spending LTX Apr 2014 #96
They were the top 6 donors for the opposition to I-1000 in Washington State. AtheistCrusader Apr 2014 #99
Interesting. LTX Apr 2014 #103
Churches and charities are allowed to advocate on issues. AtheistCrusader Apr 2014 #105
Sheesh, where have we seen this before? skepticscott Apr 2014 #114
Actually, I simply did not know anything LTX Apr 2014 #121
I found your claim that you knew nothing about it skepticscott Apr 2014 #158
Well, I didn't. LTX Apr 2014 #163
I gave you the benefit of the doubt when you said you didn't know. AtheistCrusader Apr 2014 #196
Interesting you should say that. LTX Apr 2014 #198
AtheistCrusader is against people having a code of morals Fortinbras Armstrong Apr 2014 #180
My life is mine. Not yours. AtheistCrusader Apr 2014 #182
Kervorkian was hailed as a hero by many people of all faiths, and by those with no faith. trotsky Apr 2014 #192
That has nothing to do with falsifiability... MellowDem Apr 2014 #65
Your statement, in case you've forgotten: LTX Apr 2014 #75
No, that was indeed you... MellowDem Apr 2014 #81
Sorry, I must have missed the word "theory" in your post. LTX Apr 2014 #93
You've misconstrued a lot... MellowDem Apr 2014 #97
So be it. I'll accept my own misconstruction as sufficient reason for initial disagreement. LTX Apr 2014 #98
LTX? It is easy to disprove your claims, and religious claims, with science Brettongarcia Apr 2014 #135
Gibberish. n/t LTX Apr 2014 #147
scientism on steroids. AlbertCat Apr 2014 #137
How is scientism a made up word? cbayer Apr 2014 #145
How is it any different than religionism or religionist? AlbertCat Apr 2014 #150
Well, they are words with definitions. cbayer Apr 2014 #151
I think the "exaggerated trust" definition is apt in some cases. AlbertCat Apr 2014 #152
It means exactly what the definition says it means. cbayer Apr 2014 #153
It means trying to apply scientific method in areas that it is not applicable AlbertCat Apr 2014 #154
No one said it was a one way street or only applicable to science being misapplied. cbayer Apr 2014 #156
And who are those people? skepticscott Apr 2014 #159
Why did you feel the need to drag this into another group and call me out in the process? cbayer Apr 2014 #177
When science is removed from its parameters, LTX Apr 2014 #155
Oh, please...give us some examples of the "science answers all" mindset..if you can. skepticscott Apr 2014 #160
There are examples in this thread, if you choose to read them. n/t LTX Apr 2014 #164
Bullshit skepticscott Apr 2014 #165
See post numbers LTX Apr 2014 #168
Non-overlapping magisteria would be fantastic... Act_of_Reparation Apr 2014 #175
Oh brother. I'm not making an argument against empiricism. LTX Apr 2014 #183
My mistake. So, you're straw-manning it, then? Act_of_Reparation Apr 2014 #191
Having read the posts in the many forums here LTX Apr 2014 #194
Oh, and a rather fun examination of peculiarly modern "woo," LTX Apr 2014 #195
More bullshit...is that really all you have? skepticscott Apr 2014 #188
Well, that settles it then. LTX Apr 2014 #190
Ah, yes..playing the poor victim of bullying now skepticscott Apr 2014 #201
You should be happy, skepticscott. LTX Apr 2014 #203
What is your favorite color? stone space Apr 2014 #218
As a mathematician, I will say that sometimes it feels like Discovery, and sometimes like... stone space Apr 2014 #219
Atheist don't threaten you with damnation Politicalboi Apr 2014 #27
I would just remind you that there have been atheists with political power Fortinbras Armstrong Apr 2014 #38
Stalin replaced religion with The State/The Party. AtheistCrusader Apr 2014 #45
Stalin also attacked believers Fortinbras Armstrong Apr 2014 #69
Stalin didn't like competition. AtheistCrusader Apr 2014 #84
This is an old schtick from this poster skepticscott Apr 2014 #116
Yes, it is. And you atheists jumped through the most incredible hoops trying to deny what I said Fortinbras Armstrong Apr 2014 #140
I would not use that game as an example LostOne4Ever Apr 2014 #161
You didn't like that example? Fine. Fortinbras Armstrong Apr 2014 #166
Lol. rug Apr 2014 #173
Except Stalin did not just 'force others to be atheists'. AtheistCrusader Apr 2014 #186
The fact remains that Stalin DID at least try to force others to be atheists. Fortinbras Armstrong Apr 2014 #206
Because he didn't force atheism, he forced people to drop their loyalty to their church... trotsky Apr 2014 #207
This sounds an awful lot like what Humblebum used to say. cleanhippie Apr 2014 #211
Because you are misconstruing it. AtheistCrusader Apr 2014 #208
"one theocracy for another" okasha Apr 2014 #258
No, as I said upthread, it substituted The Party for former religious trappings. AtheistCrusader Apr 2014 #261
when do you think an Atheist President will be elected? AlbertCat Apr 2014 #178
I think it will happen and that it won't be that long. cbayer Apr 2014 #181
No, atheists have not been engaged in repression Warpy Apr 2014 #184
There is no 'atheist word'. AtheistCrusader Apr 2014 #209
I was under the impression that atheism means advancing the belief that there is no deity. DanTex Apr 2014 #227
You were under a false impression skepticscott Apr 2014 #228
There are a lot of people out there, I think skepticscott Apr 2014 #11
"the phony veneer of "liberal" and "progressive" faith will be stripped away" rug Apr 2014 #15
It does. I used ignore today for the first time. hrmjustin Apr 2014 #17
Irony still escapes you skepticscott Apr 2014 #18
No I get irony. hrmjustin Apr 2014 #19
I think one of the most interesting (and historically important) roles of "churches" LTX Apr 2014 #33
She's right - but it doesn't just apply to Atheism goldent Apr 2014 #30
I'm actually all for atheists proselytizing Prophet 451 Apr 2014 #31
One of these days... I'm going to go to the mormons at the end of the street AtheistCrusader Apr 2014 #46
I thought satanists were atheists. bravenak Apr 2014 #58
Different kind of Satanist Prophet 451 Apr 2014 #120
I have a friend who is the other kind of satanist. bravenak Apr 2014 #124
I thought satanists were atheists. AlbertCat Apr 2014 #138
I swear a guy told me that they don't believe in satan, that they like to mess with people. bravenak Apr 2014 #139
Based on the contents of the bible, if I was forced to choose AtheistCrusader Apr 2014 #197
If i had to choose, i'd make the same choice. bravenak Apr 2014 #200
Yeah, i've seen Dark Matter's videos. AtheistCrusader Apr 2014 #202
I think that "coming out" will decrease prejudice, increase understanding and cbayer Apr 2014 #34
Name the first 5 people you think of when you hear the term atheist. Leontius Apr 2014 #41
The author's position is that religion is an evil force? MellowDem Apr 2014 #67
Er, did you read the article you posted, MD? cbayer Apr 2014 #77
Then you're misconstruing her argument.... MellowDem Apr 2014 #87
Oh, please. Don't believe in evil? cbayer Apr 2014 #91
Yes MellowDem Apr 2014 #100
Yet, you and the author both seem to see religion as something cbayer Apr 2014 #101
It's bad based on my preferences... MellowDem Apr 2014 #107
So do you think religious people are less able to change their cbayer Apr 2014 #119
When their religion says... MellowDem Apr 2014 #122
But what if their religion doesn't say that cbayer Apr 2014 #123
Oh, so since YOU were never taught about "objective truths" skepticscott Apr 2014 #126
Er, did you? trotsky Apr 2014 #108
Thus the drop in religious affiliation as the Internet helps spread the good news about Atheism. Arugula Latte Apr 2014 #62
Since the internet, the porn industry is also booming. rug Apr 2014 #73
So? Arugula Latte Apr 2014 #102
The internet spreads all sorts of things. rug Apr 2014 #109
My point was that when people talk about the emperor of religion being naked, Arugula Latte Apr 2014 #111
Though both events are occurring, there is absolutely no evidence that there cbayer Apr 2014 #80
MIT is science-y. Arugula Latte Apr 2014 #104
That's from Olin College. rug Apr 2014 #110
Published in the MIT Technology Review. cleanhippie Apr 2014 #112
Researched at Olin College, not MIT. Not as science-y. rug Apr 2014 #115
Yes, this "study" has been posted here and is deeply flawed. cbayer Apr 2014 #118
I'd say it presents an interesting hypothesis. Brettongarcia Apr 2014 #133
In my religiously fervent community, I have probably been outed as an atheist. callous taoboy Apr 2014 #95
Is there an opportunity for discussion and education here? cbayer Apr 2014 #125
I just don't see what good it would do. callous taoboy Apr 2014 #127
I'm not one to easily share my personal details in this area either. cbayer Apr 2014 #128
Yeah, that was a great evening on so many levels. callous taoboy Apr 2014 #129
I just spent the evening with someone who had some great Kesey stories. cbayer Apr 2014 #131
Great article. The big difference in the New Atheism is that it is more visible. And more acceptable Brettongarcia Apr 2014 #134
I can't remember ever "coming out" as an atheist. It's never been a secret. stone space Apr 2014 #217
Combats the beliefs of somebody who doesn't believe in atheists! cbayer Apr 2014 #220
There are people who don't believe in atheists.... MellowDem Apr 2014 #223
Your experience is not the only one... MellowDem Apr 2014 #221
I've been "out" as an atheist for half a century now, but no, I don't know... stone space Apr 2014 #226
You're certainly showing you know little... MellowDem Apr 2014 #229
What exactly is it that I said that has you in such a tizzy that you feel the need... stone space Apr 2014 #230
I'm not insulting you... MellowDem Apr 2014 #231
What arguement of mine are you critiquing? stone space Apr 2014 #233
The argument that coming out atheist doesn't combat religion... MellowDem Apr 2014 #235
Ok, now I'm really confused. I came to this thread, obstensibly about folks... stone space Apr 2014 #236
You said an opinion... MellowDem Apr 2014 #237
The "opinion" that I stated was this: stone space Apr 2014 #239
You keep leaving a part out, why is that? MellowDem Apr 2014 #243
Please don't do that. stone space Apr 2014 #240
Your claims to titles... MellowDem Apr 2014 #241
Of course not. stone space Apr 2014 #242
You are most certainly not a troll. cbayer Apr 2014 #245
I keep going back to my original post and rereading it, trying to figure out... stone space Apr 2014 #248
It's not you. cbayer Apr 2014 #250
Someone alerted on your post, FYI Heddi Apr 2014 #247
I wonder who #7 is. rug Apr 2014 #249
I wonder who the alerter is? Heddi Apr 2014 #251
I'm sure it couldn't have been you. #7 doesn't sound a bit like you. rug Apr 2014 #252
What if I was? What if I wasn't? Do we all have to run our comments by you before hitting "submit?" Heddi Apr 2014 #253
If you posted your jury results (for whatever purpose), you should stand behind your vote. rug Apr 2014 #254
Who says I don't stand behind my vote? Heddi Apr 2014 #256
Oh, then you must be the one who didn't post a comment. rug Apr 2014 #257
Fascinating. trotsky Apr 2014 #259
And, as usual, you'd be wrong. rug Apr 2014 #260
Dunno - I would have alerted on that if I saw it muriel_volestrangler Apr 2014 #263
Lol! rug Apr 2014 #255
Welcom to DU. rug Apr 2014 #222
If only your school... MellowDem Apr 2014 #224
Maybe but it was hardly unique. rug Apr 2014 #225
Were you in Power Memorial when Lew Alcindor was there? Jim__ Apr 2014 #232
He graduated two years ahead of me. rug Apr 2014 #234
IIRC, the older one graduated in '64, the younger one in '66. Jim__ Apr 2014 #238
Alcindor graduated in 65. I graduated in 67. Small world. rug Apr 2014 #244
I'll do that. Jim__ Apr 2014 #246
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Why Coming Out as an Athe...»Reply #112