Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
5. I was responding to this bit.
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 12:49 PM
Jun 2014

"But, there is no reason to think that non-invasive techniques will not be developed considering how much our current technology, such as ultrasound, has improved in recent years. As the researchers pointed out,"

Granted, the article says 'such as' ultrasound, not 'exclusively'.

The mapping is fascinating. I'm just pointing out a mechanism by which we can already induce involuntary mental alterations in another part of the brain, because the mechanism here is likely the same.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Brain Stimulation Results...»Reply #5