Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Richard Dawkins's lack of sympathy for those who cling to religion is a shame [View all]skepticscott
(13,029 posts)13. Here's the kicker
I despair when I hear people claim that "religion causes wars". People cause wars, people who think their own beliefs, ideas, perspectives and needs are at the centre of the universe, or should be. There's a lot of it about. Unsurprisingly.
Yes, it IS unsurprising. Because self-righteous people like the author have a Huff Post fit when people like Dawkins or PZ Myers dare to point out that the "beliefs, ideas, perspectives and needs" of the religious are NOT at the center of the universe, that they should not be deferred to just because there's a "god" involved, and that those religionistas responding to mere offense or hurt feelings about a drawing of their prophet or a mistreated sacred cracker with violence or threats of violence are the ones behaving like mindless fanatics or spoiled, privileged children.
Some day, someone is going to post an article about atheism here that actually contains some genuine thought and insight. Probably not this OP, given their past history of posting this kind of vapid crap, and probably not any time soon, but I have hope.
Yes, it IS unsurprising. Because self-righteous people like the author have a Huff Post fit when people like Dawkins or PZ Myers dare to point out that the "beliefs, ideas, perspectives and needs" of the religious are NOT at the center of the universe, that they should not be deferred to just because there's a "god" involved, and that those religionistas responding to mere offense or hurt feelings about a drawing of their prophet or a mistreated sacred cracker with violence or threats of violence are the ones behaving like mindless fanatics or spoiled, privileged children.
Some day, someone is going to post an article about atheism here that actually contains some genuine thought and insight. Probably not this OP, given their past history of posting this kind of vapid crap, and probably not any time soon, but I have hope.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
79 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Richard Dawkins's lack of sympathy for those who cling to religion is a shame [View all]
cbayer
Jun 2014
OP
Ahh, those imaginary "extremist" anti-theists that seem to only exist in your head...
Humanist_Activist
Jun 2014
#67
I thought the author did a good job of talking about both his strengths and his weaknesses.
cbayer
Jun 2014
#8
From all the scratching going on in this thread I'd say she's made some uncomfortable points.
rug
Jun 2014
#10
LOL. You're free to call youself whatever you choose. I doubt some clique will deny you that.
pinto
Jun 2014
#48
Oh, BS. It's about some agenda you have about cbayer and her clique, as you call it.
pinto
Jun 2014
#51
What is she complaining about? Seriously, I just read the entire article, I don't understand her...
Humanist_Activist
Jun 2014
#66
And yet somehow she comes off as more patronizing, and more insulting to believers...
trotsky
Jun 2014
#70
"1. the sharing of another's emotions, esp of sorrow or anguish; pity; compassion "
AtheistCrusader
Jun 2014
#74