Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Richard Dawkins's lack of sympathy for those who cling to religion is a shame [View all]Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)66. What is she complaining about? Seriously, I just read the entire article, I don't understand her...
complaint. Does she expect Dawkins to sympathize with the willfully ignorant, the dishonest, and those who have cognitive dissonance?
To put it simply, I don't know what she expects him to do, lie about what he thinks? His psychological theorizing about the origins or influences on belief may be naive but they warrant nothing more than an education, or a disclaimer about his opinion. But that's the worse you can say about him.
Yet, from the religious and some secular people alike, he becomes enemy number one, to borrow a label from politics, its like they are suffering from Dawkins Derangement Syndrome.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
79 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Richard Dawkins's lack of sympathy for those who cling to religion is a shame [View all]
cbayer
Jun 2014
OP
Ahh, those imaginary "extremist" anti-theists that seem to only exist in your head...
Humanist_Activist
Jun 2014
#67
I thought the author did a good job of talking about both his strengths and his weaknesses.
cbayer
Jun 2014
#8
From all the scratching going on in this thread I'd say she's made some uncomfortable points.
rug
Jun 2014
#10
LOL. You're free to call youself whatever you choose. I doubt some clique will deny you that.
pinto
Jun 2014
#48
Oh, BS. It's about some agenda you have about cbayer and her clique, as you call it.
pinto
Jun 2014
#51
What is she complaining about? Seriously, I just read the entire article, I don't understand her...
Humanist_Activist
Jun 2014
#66
And yet somehow she comes off as more patronizing, and more insulting to believers...
trotsky
Jun 2014
#70
"1. the sharing of another's emotions, esp of sorrow or anguish; pity; compassion "
AtheistCrusader
Jun 2014
#74