Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Saying religion "can be" a force for good is missing the point gcomeau Jun 2014 #1
Great post. trotsky Jun 2014 #2
It's a "great post" only if you approve of anti-religious bigotry Fortinbras Armstrong Jun 2014 #75
LMAO! trotsky Jun 2014 #87
No, we dislike it when skepticscott Jun 2014 #91
That statement was bigoted Fortinbras Armstrong Jun 2014 #94
Your main problem right now, FA, apart from your incredible dishonesty... trotsky Jun 2014 #95
Unlike you, Trotsky, I am ALWAYS honest. Fortinbras Armstrong Jun 2014 #98
Fascinating that you yourself can post the definition, but you cannot see that the poster in questio AtheistCrusader Jun 2014 #100
BWAH HA HA HA HA trotsky Jun 2014 #107
.... Goblinmonger Jun 2014 #96
As expected, all you have is lame hand-waving skepticscott Jun 2014 #97
OK, show me that the statement Fortinbras Armstrong Jun 2014 #99
Um, it doesn't say your extrapolation at all. AtheistCrusader Jun 2014 #101
OK. Here it goes Goblinmonger Jun 2014 #103
Fortinbras also abused 'undermines' to mean 'incapable of rational thought.' AtheistCrusader Jun 2014 #104
Didn't want to confuse him. Goblinmonger Jun 2014 #105
In your mind it is saying that religious people are incapable skepticscott Jun 2014 #118
If it is not say that religious people are incapable of rational thought, then what does it say? Fortinbras Armstrong Jun 2014 #134
Apparently you can't skepticscott Jun 2014 #92
Yeah, I can't accept bigotry Fortinbras Armstrong Jun 2014 #93
You can't IDENTIFY bigotry. AtheistCrusader Jun 2014 #102
Yeah, the kind of religion you describe has big issues. Htom Sirveaux Jun 2014 #3
It goes well beyond the notion of "God's testing us to see if we obey". trotsky Jun 2014 #8
Some kinds of Calvinism are like that. Htom Sirveaux Jun 2014 #9
How do you suppose someone who believes abortion is murder... trotsky Jun 2014 #11
Poorly, in many cases. Htom Sirveaux Jun 2014 #17
In your opinion. trotsky Jun 2014 #19
Speaking of holy texts... Htom Sirveaux Jun 2014 #22
Your link doesn't go any where. Is it supposed to? Jim__ Jun 2014 #23
Thanks, fixed! Htom Sirveaux Jun 2014 #24
Thanks. Jim__ Jun 2014 #25
Yes, various sects in Christianity generally all have their preferred translations. trotsky Jun 2014 #27
Then I leave you to your opinions, Htom Sirveaux Jun 2014 #30
Opinions indeed. trotsky Jun 2014 #36
How the various religions define love isn't the problem Act_of_Reparation Jun 2014 #21
That was an example of a tradition making morality Htom Sirveaux Jun 2014 #33
As I admittedly lack the philosophical chops... Act_of_Reparation Jun 2014 #34
"The kind of religion you describe" is exactly the kind of religion skepticscott Jun 2014 #12
I agree that there are a lot of conservative religious folks out there. Htom Sirveaux Jun 2014 #18
Yup. Hissyspit Jun 2014 #52
And the fallout/unintended consequences? AtheistCrusader Jun 2014 #4
Thank you for pointing that out. Htom Sirveaux Jun 2014 #5
Oh my. AtheistCrusader Jun 2014 #6
You're welcome! Htom Sirveaux Jun 2014 #7
Yeah the comment suggesting the schools be burnt down was really fantastic. Leontius Jun 2014 #14
It's a little extreme. AtheistCrusader Jun 2014 #15
Here's what you actually have skepticscott Jun 2014 #10
I was going to say the same thing. rickford66 Jun 2014 #131
If anyone could do it, why is it primarily religious people who are doing it? rug Jun 2014 #132
all of those "good" things can be done 100% as well without any religion nt msongs Jun 2014 #13
Agree. But a lot of them aren't being done. cbayer Jun 2014 #16
Two things: trotsky Jun 2014 #20
Great atricle! My parish made the list by the way. hrmjustin Jun 2014 #26
That is so cool, justin! cbayer Jun 2014 #28
No we don't use parishioners for this program. hrmjustin Jun 2014 #29
But all this kind of help can be provided by any charity intaglio Jun 2014 #31
I don't think it merits special praise, but cbayer Jun 2014 #32
Or funded by the taxpayer. trotsky Jun 2014 #35
Sorry to be repetitive, but I think the context really counts - pinto Jun 2014 #37
Sure context counts. trotsky Jun 2014 #38
Both govt and secular groups support various programs. Often govt does it thru the grant process. pinto Jun 2014 #39
Then how about we drop the nonsense about religious groups being the only thing... trotsky Jun 2014 #40
I'm not going to get into this roundabout. When I have input, I'll post. pinto Jun 2014 #42
You already drove yourself right into it. trotsky Jun 2014 #43
Thank you I agree with your points. phil89 Jun 2014 #61
OK. Suggest you confront the RW agenda and leave personal issues to the side. pinto Jun 2014 #63
Puh-lease. trotsky Jun 2014 #66
Which, of course, no one said Fortinbras Armstrong Jun 2014 #76
Bwah ha ha ha! trotsky Jun 2014 #88
Why shouldn't they be extolled? hrmjustin Jun 2014 #41
Where, if anywhere, did I say they should not be extolled? intaglio Jun 2014 #44
How are they attracting special praise? hrmjustin Jun 2014 #45
Because they are being singled out as examples of why religion can be a force for good intaglio Jun 2014 #46
Well it is an atricle specifically designed to show the good religion does. hrmjustin Jun 2014 #47
Why? I thought all religion was, by definition, good intaglio Jun 2014 #48
There are plenty of charites both religious and secular have gone bad or are frauds. hrmjustin Jun 2014 #49
So that boils down to religion not being the reason for the charitable works in the OP intaglio Jun 2014 #50
The articles point is to show religion at its best. hrmjustin Jun 2014 #51
And how does that has relevance to my previous comment? intaglio Jun 2014 #56
I am sorry but I don't get your complaint about this article. hrmjustin Jun 2014 #58
That is now obvious n/t intaglio Jun 2014 #59
Well you have a good night. hrmjustin Jun 2014 #60
What's wrong with that? okasha Jun 2014 #82
Ok there are several varied points in your post intaglio Jun 2014 #83
Thanks, that helps me understand where you're coming from okasha Jun 2014 #84
We'll have to agree to differ about the "angle" - for now intaglio Jun 2014 #86
You're right. okasha Jun 2014 #89
Continued from above. Phone doesn't handle edits well. okasha Jun 2014 #90
"remember the church worker does not only want to save the body" goldent Jun 2014 #85
Because they're the ones doing it. rug Jun 2014 #53
They are being extolled, in this instance, because of their religions intaglio Jun 2014 #54
They are being extolled because they are - and have been - doing it. rug Jun 2014 #55
So their faith has nothing to do with their works intaglio Jun 2014 #57
I'm sure it has a lot do do with it but they're being acknowledged for their works not their faith. rug Jun 2014 #62
But the reason for the article is to exemplify faith intaglio Jun 2014 #64
I am curious as to why you didn't reply to my response to you. cbayer Jun 2014 #65
Because, largely, your original response was pretty uncontroversial intaglio Jun 2014 #67
I don't think it is special pleading at all. cbayer Jun 2014 #68
But cbayer, why the need to praise and single out belief or even non-belief when it comes to... trotsky Jun 2014 #69
Because it is a vital part of her agenda skepticscott Jun 2014 #70
It's almost if they are making $$$ or get their livelihood from religion. n/t Fix The Stupid Jun 2014 #71
I know, from selling books skepticscott Jun 2014 #72
If you actually check my posts I have said, explicitly, that good should be extolled intaglio Jun 2014 #73
Well we will have to disagree on this because I don't cbayer Jun 2014 #74
The organization teaches youths to work together to solve problems. Ilsa Jun 2014 #77
Exactly. cbayer Jun 2014 #78
The tip of a very large iceberg goldent Jun 2014 #79
Yes, and the vast majority neither get nor seek recognition. cbayer Jun 2014 #80
Agreed! Without these groups this country would have deeper problems. hrmjustin Jun 2014 #81
None of which require religion phil89 Jun 2014 #106
True but the point of the article ix to point out the good religion does. hrmjustin Jun 2014 #108
So, religion does it? AtheistCrusader Jun 2014 #109
I can not say what they would be doing if they wrre not believers but I suspect many would be hrmjustin Jun 2014 #110
I might accept the OP's source claim that it CAN be a force for good, but AtheistCrusader Jun 2014 #112
No I think we can just praise these people and leave it at that. hrmjustin Jun 2014 #113
That wasn't the point of the OP. AtheistCrusader Jun 2014 #114
I think it was to praise religion. The horror! hrmjustin Jun 2014 #117
I'm sure it was. AtheistCrusader Jun 2014 #120
Posts are posted here to show the bad side of religion. hrmjustin Jun 2014 #123
I suspect this is a psychological thing. AtheistCrusader Jun 2014 #125
And those ops should be challenged like we challenge thebthreads that show religion in a bad light. hrmjustin Jun 2014 #126
No, no, no!!!! cbayer Jun 2014 #116
thanks cbayer. You would think it is a great sin to praise these organizations from the responses hrmjustin Jun 2014 #119
It is a great sin you apologist!! cbayer Jun 2014 #121
Thanks for posting this op. The responses unfortunately are predictable. hrmjustin Jun 2014 #124
Yet no one actually said that. AtheistCrusader Jun 2014 #122
And no where in the article does it say that it does require religion. cbayer Jun 2014 #111
First let's see what data you are basing this claim on: trotsky Jun 2014 #115
No one says that religious groups never do good LynnTTT Jun 2014 #127
Actually, most religious charities have no such condition. cbayer Jun 2014 #128
And that claim is based on what facts? skepticscott Jun 2014 #130
Sorry but most religious charities do not require this. Where did you get that from? hrmjustin Jun 2014 #129
"An atheist can also do good.' rug Jun 2014 #133
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Yes, Religion Can Still B...»Reply #96