Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

How long ago was libodem Jul 2014 #1
1977 Goblinmonger Jul 2014 #2
I was thinking I had read it before libodem Jul 2014 #3
I just thought about it a little more libodem Jul 2014 #4
Aren't a large number of those 3.814 believers in many gods? No Vested Interest Jul 2014 #5
Oops! Starboard Tack Jul 2014 #6
Take it up with your wife Goblinmonger Jul 2014 #8
I don't get involved in these discussions with my wife. Starboard Tack Jul 2014 #9
Post removed Post removed Jul 2014 #11
When was your family attacked? Starboard Tack Jul 2014 #12
Post removed Post removed Jul 2014 #18
"You and your family are the last people . . . " rug Jul 2014 #34
"Definitions of atheist and agnostic don't really interest me" Yet you responded to NoVestedInterest AtheistCrusader Jul 2014 #44
Not really. Starboard Tack Jul 2014 #58
That is perfectly within the specification of 'atheist'. AtheistCrusader Jul 2014 #61
I understand that Starboard Tack Jul 2014 #70
The 3.8 billion represents those who believe in the god of Abraham Goblinmonger Jul 2014 #7
We have a winner! AtheistCrusader Jul 2014 #43
What I learned in the Religion Group yesterday okasha Jul 2014 #10
Yup! I doubt he would've last 5 minutes in A&A Starboard Tack Jul 2014 #13
Something you may have missed is the fact that the man who coined the word agnostic Leontius Jul 2014 #14
Another one of those sciency dudes. okasha Jul 2014 #15
So who has been blocked from AA for that? Goblinmonger Jul 2014 #16
Why do you keep people who are ppred on you banned list? hrmjustin Jul 2014 #17
It seems that some of the biggest assholes on DU skepticscott Jul 2014 #19
Markcharles was an atheist and regularly signs up to troll du and the religion room. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #20
It seems that some of the biggest assholes on DU rug Jul 2014 #36
The skulls over the gate are part of the decor. okasha Jul 2014 #21
Are you going to answer Goblinmonger Jul 2014 #23
Calm down. okasha Jul 2014 #26
tone trolling. When done to women it is one of the many symptoms of misogyny. Warren Stupidity Jul 2014 #74
Are you actually insinuating this woman is a misogynist? rug Jul 2014 #82
His good buddy trotsky okasha Jul 2014 #83
if we alert trolled they way the god squad does your post would be hidden. Warren Stupidity Jul 2014 #73
I'm sure you tried. okasha Jul 2014 #84
Sorry but both sides alert. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #87
I think I can speak for the other hosts Goblinmonger Jul 2014 #22
Oh ok. seems odd though. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #24
It is not odd at all. Mariana Jul 2014 #69
You mean keeping it up as a reminder? hrmjustin Jul 2014 #79
yes but hrmjustin is very concerned. Warren Stupidity Jul 2014 #75
Concerned no but curious. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #91
Who's been blocked for not being an atheist? okasha Jul 2014 #25
Read the list yourself skepticscott Jul 2014 #29
3, 4, 6, 8, 12. rug Jul 2014 #35
So Carl Sagan was famous and he had a PhD, so he couldn't possibly be wrong? skepticscott Jul 2014 #30
I have an honest question. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #31
Sorry, that's not an honest question. It was answered many times in that thread, and you know that. skepticscott Jul 2014 #32
I didn't read the thread because it did not interest me. I was just wondering. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #33
Because it is insulting Act_of_Reparation Jul 2014 #41
Thank you very much for explaining it to me. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #42
Did you read the thread? AtheistCrusader Jul 2014 #45
Not to me. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #46
The OP starts out by quoting Carl Sagan making an error. AtheistCrusader Jul 2014 #48
But he did say these things? hrmjustin Jul 2014 #49
The quotes in the op? Yes. AtheistCrusader Jul 2014 #50
But if he said it then it is fair game here. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #51
Ah, but then the pearl-clutching when we point out the error, and correctly identify him as an ath AtheistCrusader Jul 2014 #52
This all seems like it can be debated in a reasonable manner. You seem much more knowledgeable on hrmjustin Jul 2014 #53
It was debated. Extensively. AtheistCrusader Jul 2014 #54
Do you object to it being posted? hrmjustin Jul 2014 #55
I object to the material in the post, by the author of the material as disingenious and dishonest. AtheistCrusader Jul 2014 #56
Ok so you disagree with Sagan on the issue and you disagreed with those who agreed with him. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #57
For starters, yes. AtheistCrusader Jul 2014 #59
Thank you for explaining your thoughts. I was trying to get a feel for why that post went downhill. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #60
There is a common gambit used by some believers to frame atheism as a belief system. AtheistCrusader Jul 2014 #62
I don't believe there is a burden on anyone unless you are trying to convert someone. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #63
There is an issue of credibility. AtheistCrusader Jul 2014 #64
Well legal issues are a different storry and proof is important. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #65
This is a political board. AtheistCrusader Jul 2014 #66
Good points. I will catch tomorrow my friend. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #67
Good night. AtheistCrusader Jul 2014 #68
So Carl Sagan was famous and he had a PhD, so he couldn't possibly be wrong? AlbertCat Jul 2014 #92
What's a "degress"? mr blur Jul 2014 #77
It's a piece of paper you get okasha Jul 2014 #85
Sagan's definition of an atheist is quite incorrect. djean111 Jul 2014 #27
One of the two groups you identified has no burden of showing compelling evidence. AtheistCrusader Jul 2014 #47
I know. The need to deposit that burden mystifies me. djean111 Jul 2014 #72
Oh my goodness, I completely misread your post. AtheistCrusader Jul 2014 #80
No, not stupid, your reply makes sense bearing in mind it was not clear I was quoting. djean111 Jul 2014 #86
This message was self-deleted by its author gcomeau Jul 2014 #96
You know what I learned in Religion today? EvolveOrConvolve Jul 2014 #28
That's about all you get out of - or contribute to - the Religion Group. rug Jul 2014 #37
yes it is quite ok to personally attack atheists. Warren Stupidity Jul 2014 #81
No we are not. Nice try at broad brushing us Warren. Starboard Tack Jul 2014 #88
Care to provide a link to where I called a member an asshole? Starboard Tack Jul 2014 #89
Link EvolveOrConvolve Jul 2014 #93
I can't find that thread, do you have a link? hrmjustin Jul 2014 #90
Link EvolveOrConvolve Jul 2014 #94
Thank you. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #95
Could you clarify okasha Jul 2014 #97
What I've observed is that most people don't truely believe. Rod Beauvex Jul 2014 #38
Got data? okasha Jul 2014 #39
Do you mean that believers have doubts but don't want to say it? hrmjustin Jul 2014 #40
"We do have our doubts and healthy skepticism" EvilAL Jul 2014 #98
No, it is natural for believers to have doubts at times. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #99
Ok, So EvilAL Jul 2014 #100
if someone has doubts I would ask why and listen. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #102
That is a nice thing to do, EvilAL Jul 2014 #104
I would not judge them. they would have to follow their heart. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #106
I don't know if I would call it judging EvilAL Jul 2014 #108
It is insulting to believers as a whole to say most of them don't really believe. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #109
Really have no way of knowing if someone does or doesn't believe anyway. EvilAL Jul 2014 #110
I have no dou t some are going through the motions but I don't think it is a majority. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #111
It probably isn't the majority EvilAL Jul 2014 #112
it implies we are lying. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #113
Only if you take it that way. EvilAL Jul 2014 #114
Having doubts" okasha Jul 2014 #101
No, I don't understand, please give me more examples. EvilAL Jul 2014 #103
So you have doubts about your reading comprehension? okasha Jul 2014 #105
Nah, I'm pretty good with it, EvilAL Jul 2014 #107
Well, this group has many people of many opinions. longship Jul 2014 #71
Digression: Both Bach and Mozart were fervent believers, actually Act_of_Reparation Jul 2014 #76
You are probably right about that. longship Jul 2014 #78
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»What I learned in the Rel...»Reply #90