Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
9. You know what?
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 11:35 AM
Jul 2014

You are right. As a practicing Catholic, it does appear she was saying she was mested not that she was molested. Perhaps in a situation like that, the church could loosen up the rules a little bit.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

They should be mandatory reporters Goblinmonger Jul 2014 #1
Happy to once again be on the opposite side of an issue from Bigoted Bill Donohue. n/t trotsky Jul 2014 #2
Well, I am unhappy to be on the same side as Bill Donohue Fortinbras Armstrong Jul 2014 #13
Not even analogous. trotsky Jul 2014 #24
Absolutely right. The Tarasoff duty to warn/protect overrides confidentiality Jackpine Radical Jul 2014 #26
Which didn't play a role at all in this decision. rug Jul 2014 #27
Actually, you're right. Jackpine Radical Jul 2014 #28
There's a link to the decision in this thread. rug Jul 2014 #29
It doesn't sound like this teen was confessing. drm604 Jul 2014 #3
If mental health care and attorneys need to report Goblinmonger Jul 2014 #5
This is not Tarasoff. You're confusing two standards. rug Jul 2014 #17
You know what? yeoman6987 Jul 2014 #9
What? drm604 Jul 2014 #10
I read yeoman's post as... NeoGreen Jul 2014 #11
Okay. That makes sense. drm604 Jul 2014 #12
That's exactly what the decision pivoted on. rug Jul 2014 #16
Not really a case of casting saints into the sea. AtheistCrusader Jul 2014 #4
Are you trying to say something about the expectation of privacy contained in the Fourth Amendment rug Jul 2014 #18
Actually both, in practice. AtheistCrusader Jul 2014 #30
Telling the priest of a crime edhopper Jul 2014 #6
Haha... gcomeau Jul 2014 #7
No edhopper Jul 2014 #8
Ah, sneering at Catholics. Just the sort of behavior I have come to expect in the Religion forum Fortinbras Armstrong Jul 2014 #14
By all means... gcomeau Jul 2014 #15
Dude, don't feed them! cleanhippie Jul 2014 #20
Is "sneer" on your word-of-the-day calendar or what? cleanhippie Jul 2014 #19
Check your tattoo to see if he spelled it right. rug Jul 2014 #22
. cleanhippie Jul 2014 #23
. rug Jul 2014 #25
Maybe if the org wasn't so sneer-worthy... AtheistCrusader Jul 2014 #31
The privilege is not rooted in the Fifth Amendment. rug Jul 2014 #21
I thought edhopper Jul 2014 #37
That applies in situations where a privilege exists, rug Jul 2014 #38
I was thinking edhopper Jul 2014 #39
The clergy/penintent privilege is recognized by statute in most jurisdictions. rug Jul 2014 #40
So the clergy edhopper Jul 2014 #41
You clearly don't understand the nature of the privilege or whom it protects. rug Jul 2014 #42
How does someone telling a priest they are being sexually abused edhopper Jul 2014 #43
It protects all things said by all people during a confession. rug Jul 2014 #44
The child waived privilege, even more than that, this isn't a confession, but rather a victim... Humanist_Activist Jul 2014 #32
What was the kid confessing to? Nothing. EvilAL Jul 2014 #33
Priests should be obligated to report anything that may be sexual abuse of a child. cbayer Jul 2014 #34
I thought if a crime was committed Manifestor_of_Light Jul 2014 #35
I agree and was surprised that the article did not address this. cbayer Jul 2014 #36
I would think a choice to remain anonymous when reporting would be a reasonable compromise. pinto Jul 2014 #45
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Louisiana ruling on confe...»Reply #9