Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: What I learned in the Religion group today. [View all]EvilAL
(1,437 posts)104. That is a nice thing to do,
but what would you say? How would you act towards a group of believers that always have doubts and skepticism about their belief(s). That would have tens of thousands of sub groups of the belief(s), other than, "maybe they don't really believe"?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
114 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"Definitions of atheist and agnostic don't really interest me" Yet you responded to NoVestedInterest
AtheistCrusader
Jul 2014
#44
Something you may have missed is the fact that the man who coined the word agnostic
Leontius
Jul 2014
#14
Markcharles was an atheist and regularly signs up to troll du and the religion room.
hrmjustin
Jul 2014
#20
tone trolling. When done to women it is one of the many symptoms of misogyny.
Warren Stupidity
Jul 2014
#74
if we alert trolled they way the god squad does your post would be hidden.
Warren Stupidity
Jul 2014
#73
So Carl Sagan was famous and he had a PhD, so he couldn't possibly be wrong?
skepticscott
Jul 2014
#30
Sorry, that's not an honest question. It was answered many times in that thread, and you know that.
skepticscott
Jul 2014
#32
I didn't read the thread because it did not interest me. I was just wondering.
hrmjustin
Jul 2014
#33
Ah, but then the pearl-clutching when we point out the error, and correctly identify him as an ath
AtheistCrusader
Jul 2014
#52
This all seems like it can be debated in a reasonable manner. You seem much more knowledgeable on
hrmjustin
Jul 2014
#53
I object to the material in the post, by the author of the material as disingenious and dishonest.
AtheistCrusader
Jul 2014
#56
Ok so you disagree with Sagan on the issue and you disagreed with those who agreed with him.
hrmjustin
Jul 2014
#57
Thank you for explaining your thoughts. I was trying to get a feel for why that post went downhill.
hrmjustin
Jul 2014
#60
There is a common gambit used by some believers to frame atheism as a belief system.
AtheistCrusader
Jul 2014
#62
I don't believe there is a burden on anyone unless you are trying to convert someone.
hrmjustin
Jul 2014
#63
One of the two groups you identified has no burden of showing compelling evidence.
AtheistCrusader
Jul 2014
#47
No, not stupid, your reply makes sense bearing in mind it was not clear I was quoting.
djean111
Jul 2014
#86
It is insulting to believers as a whole to say most of them don't really believe.
hrmjustin
Jul 2014
#109
I have no dou t some are going through the motions but I don't think it is a majority.
hrmjustin
Jul 2014
#111