Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Sorry, Richard Dawkins, but you did not actually hurt my feelings [View all]AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)40. Whiney rant?
Well...
It starts out all... I really don't want to BUT.... I MUST "get back into the melee" because someone quoted "accolades from misogynist creeps" on the internet.
Sounds whiney to me. "But fuck it!"
Then an admission that Dawkins is too smart to be misogynistic BUT his comments might, maybe, without evidence, get a bunch of "hell yeahs from men who really want to believe women are inferior" We don't know if it did.
Sounds whiney.
And it's just awful because Dawkins thinks (even tho' the rant said he's to smart to think this) women are incapable of reason "because theyre wallowing in tears and probably menstrual blood."
Whiney with hyperbole.
The rant certainly isn't as level headed as it was going for.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"every shitty 18-year-old boy who wants to win an argument with his girlfriend resorts to it"
AtheistCrusader
Aug 2014
#1
Ok, it was deplorable in any audience that includes women or any other group that may
cbayer
Aug 2014
#34
But they were entirely innocent. The Prosecutor committed a crime. The media, her included,
AtheistCrusader
Aug 2014
#46