Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

God gives us so much hope, with so much evidence of his fruits Brettongarcia Aug 2014 #1
One could say the same of many things Prophet 451 Aug 2014 #2
There certainly are other ways mass delusional behavior can be induced. Warren Stupidity Aug 2014 #7
How many would it take to constitute mass delusional behavior? Starboard Tack Aug 2014 #36
I'm not saying religion should get a special pass AlbertCat Aug 2014 #71
Lather, rinse, repeat. longship Aug 2014 #3
As needed. Warren Stupidity Aug 2014 #6
Or, as not. longship Aug 2014 #9
You have the power at your disposal to trash threads, ignore posters etc. Warren Stupidity Aug 2014 #43
Well, Warren, one post gets the point across. longship Aug 2014 #44
It requires as many as I see fit to post. Warren Stupidity Aug 2014 #45
If religion is literally murderous often, as in documented cases of genocide, then it is ... Brettongarcia Aug 2014 #50
I am a lifelong atheist. longship Aug 2014 #59
My position: presenting academic, clinical, historical papers should not be considered insulting. Brettongarcia Aug 2014 #65
I would concur. longship Aug 2014 #70
Are you going to take believers to task for posting "lather, rinse, repeat" posts? EvolveOrConvolve Aug 2014 #68
Well, this is the Religion group. longship Aug 2014 #75
Yes, the Branch Davidian leadership and Tim McVeigh ended up hurting a lot of people. Htom Sirveaux Aug 2014 #4
It seems to be quite possible to induce mass delusional behavior using religious memes. Warren Stupidity Aug 2014 #5
Are you suggesting we ban religion as too potentially dangerous? Htom Sirveaux Aug 2014 #11
But it seems only the religious part of the free exercise clause edhopper Aug 2014 #12
I support critically examining religious beliefs when they are brought into political debates. Htom Sirveaux Aug 2014 #24
gotta go past last tuesday to see the story Lordquinton Aug 2014 #48
Personally, I've found that both believers and atheists largely want the same thing from each other. Htom Sirveaux Aug 2014 #84
Where did I suggest that? Warren Stupidity Aug 2014 #14
Ok, I'll rephrase. Htom Sirveaux Aug 2014 #15
Why is it when someone edhopper Aug 2014 #17
Probably because nobody is claiming that our political system can function without an opposing party Htom Sirveaux Aug 2014 #26
We don't need religion we can live without it. Warren Stupidity Aug 2014 #27
No, that is not correct. Htom Sirveaux Aug 2014 #31
Well, in this forum there are quite a few people who proclaim that religion is just ducky. Warren Stupidity Aug 2014 #35
If you don't mind my asking, what has been your personal experience with religion? Htom Sirveaux Aug 2014 #85
Actually, SCOTUS reads parts of the Constitution and Declaration to put some limits on religion Brettongarcia Aug 2014 #51
Right, because nobody else had noticed that? Starboard Tack Aug 2014 #38
Just about every time an example is brought up here by anyone identified as an atheist Warren Stupidity Aug 2014 #39
Of course I agree. How could I not agree? I see it daily Starboard Tack Aug 2014 #41
keep the insults flying tacky. It is so charming and civil. Warren Stupidity Aug 2014 #46
Like "tacky"? Those kind of insults? Starboard Tack Aug 2014 #47
oh my gosh you are so clever. Warren Stupidity Aug 2014 #49
For once, I am in complete agreement with you Starboard Tack Aug 2014 #54
Are you suggesting we ban religion as too potentially dangerous? AlbertCat Aug 2014 #72
I'm still waiting for your thread on Masada. rug Aug 2014 #8
What was the reason for the suicide at Masada? edhopper Aug 2014 #13
Roman legions building a ramp to kill them. rug Aug 2014 #16
What was their reason for killing themselves? edhopper Aug 2014 #18
I suspect they were trying to avoid crucifixion. rug Aug 2014 #20
So how it Masada edhopper Aug 2014 #22
It is as similar to Heaven's Gate, or Waco, or any other aberration Warren is fixated on, rug Aug 2014 #33
In Masada, Zionists - religious extremists? - would not cooperate with another, Roman religion Brettongarcia Aug 2014 #53
Ah, a defense of literal imperialism. rug Aug 2014 #55
Israel itself invaded Palestine, killing the original Philistines etc.. Brettongarcia Aug 2014 #58
Actually there was no Palestine then, it was Canaan. rug Aug 2014 #60
Actually, Caanan isn't quite inclusive enough; the newer word "Palestine" gets the broader geography Brettongarcia Aug 2014 #63
Actually there was no Palestine then, it was Canaan. AlbertCat Aug 2014 #73
And when he's done with Masada, okasha Aug 2014 #21
That's a good one. rug Aug 2014 #34
Fortunately, he'll just need to type it, not pronounce it. okasha Aug 2014 #37
Oh goodie, it's the old comedy double act! mr blur Aug 2014 #62
Fortunately, he'll just need to type it, not pronounce it. AlbertCat Aug 2014 #74
In Monsegur, religious extremists - Cathars - gave up their lives rather than be taken by Catholics Brettongarcia Aug 2014 #57
there's Montsegur. AlbertCat Aug 2014 #76
Religion is a framework in which it is insisted (and accepted)... trotsky Aug 2014 #10
McVeigh was an atheist when he blew up the Murrah Bldg. okasha Aug 2014 #19
From Time Magizine interview 2001 edhopper Aug 2014 #23
You missed the point. okasha Aug 2014 #25
McVeigh was associated with radical christian white supremacists when he blew up the Murrah Warren Stupidity Aug 2014 #29
He was associated with his old Army buddy, okasha Aug 2014 #40
And some recognize something like PTSD in Nichols and others. Delusions. Brettongarcia Aug 2014 #52
He was also associated with Elohim City Warren Stupidity Aug 2014 #56
Conspiracy theory, Warren? okasha Aug 2014 #64
1) McVeigh's own statement said he acted in response to "Waco"; the religious group Brettongarcia Aug 2014 #66
As I said, you seem very concerned about denying any association at all between Warren Stupidity Aug 2014 #67
I don't deny that McVeigh had contact with several militia groups. okasha Aug 2014 #69
McVeigh is sporadically confesses a link to religion: the Catholic Church, the Branch Davidians Brettongarcia Aug 2014 #87
I am gobsmacked at this post. Fix The Stupid Aug 2014 #30
Go right ahead and be gobsmacked. okasha Aug 2014 #32
No, okasha, one can be either an agnostic theist OR an agnostic atheist. trotsky Aug 2014 #42
Right wing politics, yes. Religion, no. AlbertCat Aug 2014 #78
Oh, dear. okasha Aug 2014 #79
While I'm deeply honored that you want to be my stalker, AlbertCat Aug 2014 #80
Don't take your rejection so much to heart. okasha Aug 2014 #81
Don't take your rejection so much to heart. AlbertCat Aug 2014 #82
And do stop talking to yourself. okasha Aug 2014 #83
And do stop talking to yourself. AlbertCat Aug 2014 #86
McVeigh's statement: he did it as revenge for "what the U.S. government did at Waco and Ruby Ridge" Brettongarcia Aug 2014 #61
You missed the point. AlbertCat Aug 2014 #77
I bet mcveigh also didn't believe in Santa phil89 Aug 2014 #28
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Religion and Delusion: Br...»Reply #34