It is wildly inappropriate in this context. Should I have not offered the complete paragraph? What did you think the bold was for?
Things break. It happens. I would no more blame a human for a psychological issue than I would my car for a flat tire or a thrown rod. (ignoring that some psychological issues can be a very grey area that doesn't reflect a Boolean working/broken dichotomy. Not adding nuance because every time I do, it gets taken in the precise opposite way I meant it.)
I don't get angry for a fault in a circuit. I do not blame the device. Like it chose to short.
Personal failing implies blame. Implies a choice, however bad. Not once have I suggested that. The very first response I made to you included the specification that it is not "condemnation is not necessarily implied". On accommodate, taking in people as roommates, helping them in any manner they would accept. Not freaking out or rejecting them over various episodes, or uncomfortable situations.
It is not radically different from my approach to grief for others, creating space and time for them to work through it. I can't do it for you, but I can help contribute to an environment in which you feel comfortable and safe during treatment, etc.
= new reply since forum marked as read