Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

A really silly remark. okasha Aug 2014 #1
Isn't your remark insulting to those who have gone into conservatorship? Brettongarcia Aug 2014 #12
I don't see what is wrong with Dawkins remark, I would have used unethical or irresponsible... Humanist_Activist Aug 2014 #2
What I see that is "wrong" with his remark d_r Aug 2014 #26
Some of them aren't able to become independent or live fulfilling lives... Humanist_Activist Aug 2014 #27
Would we tolerate a privileged male advising women to have the child? bluestateguy Aug 2014 #3
The word he doesn't get is "choice." okasha Aug 2014 #5
Dawkins explicitly uses the word "Choice." And he gets it right Brettongarcia Aug 2014 #11
So, the Pope, you're talking about the Pope, right? MellowDem Aug 2014 #8
Love Dawkins... longship Aug 2014 #4
Talk about a major WTF moment! hrmjustin Aug 2014 #6
"That’s not a factually wrong point of view." AtheistCrusader Aug 2014 #7
Why a second thread edhopper Aug 2014 #9
That's funny! Do you object to that in general or just when rug does it? cbayer Aug 2014 #10
People can post what they want edhopper Aug 2014 #13
Yes they can and I just wondered if you objected when it was done in general cbayer Aug 2014 #14
Sometimes people post the same subject edhopper Aug 2014 #15
Well, I guess I don't think there was really any reason to say anything about it cbayer Aug 2014 #16
Do you think edhopper Aug 2014 #17
Yes, it certainly was. It's a big story. cbayer Aug 2014 #18
What follow up? edhopper Aug 2014 #19
Since you bropught up the Pope, edhopper Aug 2014 #20
Pope!!!!!! cbayer Aug 2014 #21
Hey, I just thought of a possible explanation! cbayer Aug 2014 #22
That could be I guess edhopper Aug 2014 #24
I can see why your would not use it. There is really no need for it where cbayer Aug 2014 #25
Why did Rug post the same topic twice in rapid succession? To evade linking the Church to all this? Brettongarcia Aug 2014 #23
You might ask the author why he thought it necessary to write it. rug Aug 2014 #29
It is not immoral to give birth to a downs syndrome person. mmonk Aug 2014 #28
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»With a Tweet Advocating t...»Reply #10