Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

rug

(82,333 posts)

6. It's a very narrow decision dealing more with procedure than substance.

Reply to Jim__ (Reply #5)

Tue Sep 2, 2014, 11:52 AM

Sep 2014

Standing is a very important concept and without knowing more of New Hampshire Law, I have to say I'm persuaded to agree with its reasoning on this narrow point.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Court ruling does a disservice [View all] rug Sep 2014 OP

Wow, that seems like a pretty lame ruling. cbayer Sep 2014 #1

The standard is not whether someone is harmed by a law or not, but whether merrily Sep 2014 #2

When I read the court ruling, I have no idea whether or not it is correct. Jim__ Sep 2014 #3

It looks like the Court reversed itself. rug Sep 2014 #4

Do you agree with the current decision? Jim__ Sep 2014 #5

It's a very narrow decision dealing more with procedure than substance. rug Sep 2014 #6

OK. Thanks. Jim__ Sep 2014 #7