Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Would Finding Alien Life Change Religious Philosophies? [View all]Jim__
(15,060 posts)20. Yes, and there was a paper in 2010 that said complex life probably only evolved once in the universe
An article about the paper appeared in NewScientist: here.
An excerpt from the article:
The universe may be teeming with simple cells like bacteria, but more complex life including intelligent life is probably very rare. That is the conclusion of a radical rethink of what it took for complex life to evolve here on Earth.
It suggests that complex alien life-forms could only evolve if an event that happened just once in Earth's history was repeated somewhere else.
All animals, plants and fungi evolved from one ancestor, the first ever complex, or "eukaryotic", cell. This common ancestor had itself evolved from simple bacteria, but it has long been a mystery why this seems to have happened only once: bacteria, after all, have been around for billions of years.
The answer, say Nick Lane of University College London and Bill Martin of the University of Dusseldorf in Germany, is that whenever simple cells start to become more complex, they run into problems generating enough energy.
...
It suggests that complex alien life-forms could only evolve if an event that happened just once in Earth's history was repeated somewhere else.
All animals, plants and fungi evolved from one ancestor, the first ever complex, or "eukaryotic", cell. This common ancestor had itself evolved from simple bacteria, but it has long been a mystery why this seems to have happened only once: bacteria, after all, have been around for billions of years.
The answer, say Nick Lane of University College London and Bill Martin of the University of Dusseldorf in Germany, is that whenever simple cells start to become more complex, they run into problems generating enough energy.
...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
118 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
There are many, many times more unsuccessful adaptations than there are successful ones
Cary
Oct 2014
#16
However that requires an assertion that life on earth is unique in the universe.
Warren Stupidity
Oct 2014
#93
again, the claim that life is unique to earth is the extraordinary claim.
Warren Stupidity
Oct 2014
#108
Actually we have found water-bearing worlds in the 'goldilocks' zone in other star systems.
AtheistCrusader
Oct 2014
#19
Yes, and there was a paper in 2010 that said complex life probably only evolved once in the universe
Jim__
Oct 2014
#20
I'd imagine a curious, technological, fast-spreading species would be even more rare.
arcane1
Oct 2014
#31
Because Christianity got seriously organised to suppress and terrorise its opponents
muriel_volestrangler
Oct 2014
#47
No disagreeing with that, but there were also scientific findings and explanations that
cbayer
Oct 2014
#48
Some religions adapt to certain scientific findings, but grudgingly
muriel_volestrangler
Oct 2014
#50
I think creationism is a good example, but there are also large numbers of people
cbayer
Oct 2014
#52
People could apply the standards of evidence they use for real life to religion
muriel_volestrangler
Oct 2014
#73
But they are very different things and can't be evaluated using the same methods.
cbayer
Oct 2014
#74
Yes I would like to see the reference that says that all natural variation results from mutation.
immoderate
Oct 2014
#76
"God did it" is not an explanation. It is a deflection, a lack of an explanation.
immoderate
Oct 2014
#77
It's as good an explanation as any when there is no other explanation available.
cbayer
Oct 2014
#81
um, uh, just about everyone was catholic, unless they were protestant
Warren Stupidity
Oct 2014
#109
I think science as well as society at large is reflected in religion. Sometimes ironically.
pinto
Oct 2014
#67
WTF? the greek and roman gods are no longer believed in because science?
Warren Stupidity
Oct 2014
#94