Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

cbayer

(146,218 posts)

3. I agree that the position is hypocritical and not uniformly applied.

Reply to mr blur (Original post)

Mon Oct 13, 2014, 04:03 PM

Oct 2014

The RCC has a very, very long way to go here, but I think the information today indicates a change in direction. I hope I can see this happen in my lifetime, but I may not.

I don't think this is flame bait at all, by the way. The RCC's position on GLBT people is definitely appropriate for discussion.

And I hope that the usual anti-apologists will contribute to the conversation and be able to see that the position taken by the Vatican today is a positive step.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

20 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"If Catholic School Employees Had to Live By The Bible, They’d All Get Fired" [View all] mr blur Oct 2014 OP

Hypocrisy! Kelvin Mace Oct 2014 #1

It's another Gelliebeans Oct 2014 #2

I agree that the position is hypocritical and not uniformly applied. cbayer Oct 2014 #3

Nice name-calling. trotsky Oct 2014 #5

you are referring to the "no change in policy" HUGE ANNOUNCEMENT? Warren Stupidity Oct 2014 #7

The rules also prohibit buggering children... Hoppy Oct 2014 #4

Great question. n/t trotsky Oct 2014 #6

True! Hell, if Catholics and or Christians were required to act according to Jesus's... DrewFlorida Oct 2014 #8

Which teachings are those? cbayer Oct 2014 #9

You're supposed to sell everything you have and leave your family. Manifestor_of_Light Oct 2014 #10

Only if you are a literalist. This is totally allegorical cbayer Oct 2014 #11

that's funny. It wasn't allegorical to the first generation of christians, it was literal. Warren Stupidity Oct 2014 #12

Literally? Manifestor_of_Light Oct 2014 #13

No, I won't' show you anything. cbayer Oct 2014 #14

Says the person whose mind is set in concrete skepticscott Oct 2014 #15

Oh? Ye of strong faith? Manifestor_of_Light Oct 2014 #16

I don't have any doctrine or religious beliefs at all. cbayer Oct 2014 #17

Sounds like you're an atheist. Manifestor_of_Light Oct 2014 #18

Sounds like you don't get to define me. cbayer Oct 2014 #19

The usual suspect has never claimed to be anything but an agnostic. cbayer Oct 2014 #20