Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Shasta atheist wins $2 million settlement over drug program [View all]rug
(82,333 posts)7. You have a need to announce your ignore list on a regular basis.
Much as a dog has a nedd to lick his balls on a regular basis.
With the same result.
No one cares but the dog.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
133 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It is really a shame you no longer have any authority to put people in line.
Warren Stupidity
Oct 2014
#22
Your posts remind me of the person stung by a scoprion--Poisoned and delirious.
Gore1FL
Oct 2014
#57
I didn't realize you knew so little about your religion. It must be why you defend it so.
Gore1FL
Oct 2014
#61
Thy will be done? So God is a rapist if he forced his will on some poor unsuspect woman.
Gore1FL
Oct 2014
#79
I'm sure you'll find a translation somewhere that says indentured servant. Maybe even chattel slave.
rug
Oct 2014
#84
You spend a lot of time snarling about something you don't care - or know anything - about.
rug
Oct 2014
#90
I see, I'm telling stupid religious jokes to get a rise out of youand to amuse myself.
rug
Oct 2014
#98
I have been judged by someone deluded into believing they talk to to the creator of all things
Gore1FL
Oct 2014
#91
You might want to re-read the jucier parts of the Bible again if you are going to profess faith in i
Gore1FL
Oct 2014
#107
You do know that "parolees" are people with rights who can be injured?
Warren Stupidity
Oct 2014
#23
You really ought to read about the case first before making statements like that.
Warren Stupidity
Oct 2014
#66
Thanks for the link, and I found addtional details but stand by my opining, it should be a fine.
NYC_SKP
Oct 2014
#130
At least you made it clear you shouldn't be taken seriously in this discussion.
Goblinmonger
Oct 2014
#74
Please explain why he should have to forfeit the damages because you have issues
beam me up scottie
Oct 2014
#56
You know, you really do seem keen on speaking up for/on behalf of other people -
mr blur
Oct 2014
#132