Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Religious dagger OK at Auburn elementary school [View all]cbayer
(146,218 posts)47. No, minority groups are rarely the problem.
But individuals who think they have the answer and that everyone else is delusional often are.
While I understand and agree that there is discrimination, the way to eliminate this is by challenging it when it occurs, not by applying the same kind of discrimination upon others, which is what you seem to want to do.
I'm not mocking you, by the way, I am challenging your extreme beliefs, beliefs that you appear to want to impose on others.
There is a growing, vocal movement among some nonbelievers. I truly think that it is our next civil rights movement and that we will effectively combat the discrimination that occurs. But we won't do it by discriminating against believers. That never works.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
117 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
A weapon is still a weapon, even if you personally carry it for 'symbolic' reasons. nt
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Oct 2014
#3
Nice pun but I suspect there are more people stabbed in the eye with a pencil than with a kirpan.
rug
Oct 2014
#6
We'll see if it actually happens. Sikhs have been in public schools for many years.
riqster
Oct 2014
#14
Indeed. Do we confiscate crucifixes? Do schools forbid students having Qurans in their lockers?
riqster
Oct 2014
#16
You could take this one step further and forbid and religious people from being in
cbayer
Oct 2014
#19
I would be willing to go along with prohibiting 'atheist symbols' too, yes.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Oct 2014
#38
I went to a public secondary school. Two brothers in my class routinely wore yamulkes on holy days.
pinto
Oct 2014
#60
No, I don't think it's discrimination when students are asked to wear uniforms, though
cbayer
Oct 2014
#74
I would say that a student wearing or carrying religious symbols is being religious
cbayer
Oct 2014
#22
I don't believe there's a state in the union that actually forces you to attend public schools.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Oct 2014
#25
You need to be prepared to leave your religion at home if you attend a public school?
cbayer
Oct 2014
#27
You, then, want a segregated society. In which religious people may not express themselves...
riqster
Oct 2014
#29
What would you do with an atheist patient who declared himself to be Christopher Hitchens?
rug
Oct 2014
#69
They way that you describe your interaction with patients who are religious came
cbayer
Oct 2014
#80
I actually have seen quite a few religious nurses who 'take it work'.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Oct 2014
#82
Does being a member of a religious group require following any tenets of the religion at all?
Fumesucker
Oct 2014
#100
A man who is a Christian and she sees as being a moral person, it's basically a literal statement
Fumesucker
Oct 2014
#112
There are times we are more vulnerable than others, I got caught at a vulnerable moment
Fumesucker
Oct 2014
#116
Plus, I still haven't seen any examples of US schoolyard assaults using Kripans.
riqster
Oct 2014
#50
So who will be the first to start a church that declares the gun a holy symbol
Agnosticsherbet
Oct 2014
#55
If a Sikh feels the need to fight, I expect he'd use something other than a kirpan.
rug
Oct 2014
#64