Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Religious dagger OK at Auburn elementary school [View all]Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)85. I wasn't clear enough, I think
So are patients that present with pain delusional because there is no proof that they are actually experience pain. I would hope that would not be your position.
How is this different than those that believe in a god? Who are you or I to say that they are wrong.
How is this different than those that believe in a god? Who are you or I to say that they are wrong.
I chose pain specifically as being something qualitatively different from God.
If want to use the argument that something is right because humanity generally agrees that it is true, then you will have to concede the religion argument, because an overwhelming majority of humans believe.
As I pointed out, EVERY human with a functioning nervous system (including a brain) has had direct experience with pain. That's quite a bit different from 'a majority' or even 'an overwhelming majority 'believing'. You don't 'believe in' pain - you've felt it, you've had direct proof of it. I can 'prove' to you that pain exists by doing something painful to you. I'm not trying to prove that at one particular moment in time you were in pain, just that 'pain' as a concept does have some shared reality for all of humanity. How do you similarly prove to me that God exists (in the way that humanity typically describes God in various religions)? If you want to say 'God is everything', ie, 'God is the universe', I've got no problem with that, I can interact with the universe. It 'is'. But if you want to say 'He's a 'he', who sits in judgment upon human beings after death, etc, etc, what is the actual proof, that isn't just the same thing I brought up in re unicorns? Ie, many people believe(d) in them, painted them, wrote about them, for hundreds or thousands of years, so they 'must exist'?
As to the 'challenging them', I generally agree - I'll 'challenge them' within the sandbox of an online forum, but I don't go around talking religion or lack thereof with people on a daily basis, unless I see a direct harm originating with a specific belief. And I don't go around telling people I think they're delusional, unless they specifically ask me if I consider their beliefs so. In part, because a lot of people take it as a personal insult, rather than just a statement of my opinion of non-empirically based 'belief'. And also that (people asking me if they are delusional) generally just doesn't happen offline.
And yeah, it's getting close to bedtime, I'm getting groggy here.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
117 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
A weapon is still a weapon, even if you personally carry it for 'symbolic' reasons. nt
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Oct 2014
#3
Nice pun but I suspect there are more people stabbed in the eye with a pencil than with a kirpan.
rug
Oct 2014
#6
We'll see if it actually happens. Sikhs have been in public schools for many years.
riqster
Oct 2014
#14
Indeed. Do we confiscate crucifixes? Do schools forbid students having Qurans in their lockers?
riqster
Oct 2014
#16
You could take this one step further and forbid and religious people from being in
cbayer
Oct 2014
#19
I would be willing to go along with prohibiting 'atheist symbols' too, yes.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Oct 2014
#38
I went to a public secondary school. Two brothers in my class routinely wore yamulkes on holy days.
pinto
Oct 2014
#60
No, I don't think it's discrimination when students are asked to wear uniforms, though
cbayer
Oct 2014
#74
I would say that a student wearing or carrying religious symbols is being religious
cbayer
Oct 2014
#22
I don't believe there's a state in the union that actually forces you to attend public schools.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Oct 2014
#25
You need to be prepared to leave your religion at home if you attend a public school?
cbayer
Oct 2014
#27
You, then, want a segregated society. In which religious people may not express themselves...
riqster
Oct 2014
#29
What would you do with an atheist patient who declared himself to be Christopher Hitchens?
rug
Oct 2014
#69
They way that you describe your interaction with patients who are religious came
cbayer
Oct 2014
#80
I actually have seen quite a few religious nurses who 'take it work'.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Oct 2014
#82
Does being a member of a religious group require following any tenets of the religion at all?
Fumesucker
Oct 2014
#100
A man who is a Christian and she sees as being a moral person, it's basically a literal statement
Fumesucker
Oct 2014
#112
There are times we are more vulnerable than others, I got caught at a vulnerable moment
Fumesucker
Oct 2014
#116
Plus, I still haven't seen any examples of US schoolyard assaults using Kripans.
riqster
Oct 2014
#50
So who will be the first to start a church that declares the gun a holy symbol
Agnosticsherbet
Oct 2014
#55
If a Sikh feels the need to fight, I expect he'd use something other than a kirpan.
rug
Oct 2014
#64