Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
127. You may challenge me or point out what you see as inconsistencies anytime you want.
Sat Nov 8, 2014, 09:29 PM
Nov 2014

You always have. I don't expect anything about that to change.

Condemnation seems a bit extreme. I think I challenge, but condemn?

I make no demands about how you act. In fact, I try not to make my interactions with you personal at all.

And while I point out what I see as despicable behavior in your group, I make no demands on you to do anything about it whatsoever and don't expect that you will.

I only ask that you don't deny it.

You also have a good remains of the weekend. It's way to hot here, but hopefully will get better over the next week.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What century is it again? phil89 Nov 2014 #1
Is it true that if you don't pay the priest Manifestor_of_Light Nov 2014 #2
Too clever... PeoViejo Nov 2014 #52
Funny Dorian Gray Nov 2014 #155
Oh, geez, really? cbayer Nov 2014 #3
No, you weren't skepticscott Nov 2014 #5
That's an interesting double standard. trotsky Nov 2014 #7
That's pretty diingenuous. rug Nov 2014 #47
That the very concept of exorcism bvf Nov 2014 #8
I think it more represents a wish for an easy answer cbayer Nov 2014 #9
Easy answers = religion. bvf Nov 2014 #10
I did not say that. I said that about exorcisms. cbayer Nov 2014 #12
So where do you draw the line? bvf Nov 2014 #13
I draw the line at harm. cbayer Nov 2014 #16
Four simple questions bvf Nov 2014 #17
No, you asked one question and gave 4 options for my reply. cbayer Nov 2014 #19
You addressed none bvf Nov 2014 #21
I told you I draw the line at harm. cbayer Nov 2014 #23
I've asked already. bvf Nov 2014 #29
I do not have a belief in the afterlife, but I don't know for sure cbayer Nov 2014 #31
One thing she's never discussed... trotsky Nov 2014 #34
No, you don't draw the line at harm skepticscott Nov 2014 #57
Your concerns about exorcism have been expressed quite clearly here. Warren Stupidity Nov 2014 #20
I'll make it easier for you, Feral Child Nov 2014 #30
There is no need for you to make anything easier for me. cbayer Nov 2014 #32
Not really. Feral Child Nov 2014 #42
Waffle? I state my position and you think it's waffling? cbayer Nov 2014 #45
"Thrice you will deny me..." Feral Child Nov 2014 #69
Wait, now you are placing yourself in the role of Jesus Christ and me in the role of Peter? cbayer Nov 2014 #75
Quoting is not assuming a persona, but have I struck a nerve here? Feral Child Nov 2014 #90
No. Feral Child Nov 2014 #73
You remain unclear. Are you making the definitive statement that demons do not exist? cbayer Nov 2014 #76
I'm an adult. Feral Child Nov 2014 #86
Last post, because I think some clarification is needed. cbayer Nov 2014 #89
If you actually believed that skepticscott Nov 2014 #14
lead by example then Warren Stupidity Nov 2014 #25
increase in demonic activity? LunaSea Nov 2014 #4
Duzy! hrmjustin Nov 2014 #11
Red alert! trotsky Nov 2014 #6
Who cares about this story believers are mentally ill anyway aren't they? Leontius Nov 2014 #15
That is one of the most despicable positions concerning religious cbayer Nov 2014 #18
That is a massively dishonest characterization, one that you have made repeatedly. Warren Stupidity Nov 2014 #24
So what do you believe in? bvf Nov 2014 #27
Oooooo, getting personal. That's a sure sign of losing a debate. cbayer Nov 2014 #33
I simply asked whether you believe in bvf Nov 2014 #36
And I answered you. But you made it personal by saying that I am good at telling cbayer Nov 2014 #37
Ah. Another non-answer. bvf Nov 2014 #113
I'm an agnostic, bvf. I know you don't like that answer, but that is my position regarding religion cbayer Nov 2014 #115
Hmm. bvf Nov 2014 #128
Yes, I did. cbayer Nov 2014 #129
Unbelievable. bvf Nov 2014 #130
No, absolutely believable. cbayer Nov 2014 #137
Oh, that's right--I forgot. bvf Nov 2014 #138
No, that's wrong. Religion is responsible for a lot of bad things in my view. cbayer Nov 2014 #139
Your view of religion couldn't be any squishier. bvf Nov 2014 #140
And yours any more rigid. cbayer Nov 2014 #143
When religions stop sucking at the public teat, claiming all manner skepticscott Nov 2014 #144
So much for doing good works without all the crowing bvf Nov 2014 #145
Well, that's because I am presumptuous, ignorant and insulting. cbayer Nov 2014 #146
Presumption upon presumption. bvf Nov 2014 #147
But if I take the plank out of my eye, I won't be able to make cbayer Nov 2014 #148
Looks like you could use bvf Nov 2014 #150
Yep, fresh bait is always useful, particularly when I start talking cbayer Nov 2014 #151
Oh, dear. okasha Nov 2014 #149
He's fun. Take my word for it. cbayer Nov 2014 #152
Perhaps another time. okasha Nov 2014 #153
Oh, dear. Was he fighting with the dolphins again? cbayer Nov 2014 #154
"Lord" has been taken. rug Nov 2014 #156
Much like people who claim that atheists are just believers who had a bad childhood experience trotsky Nov 2014 #28
Yup, the question in 47's been answered. rug Nov 2014 #48
And it continues TM99 Nov 2014 #51
Yes, I know. It is one of the ugliest of it's kind that I have seen here. cbayer Nov 2014 #53
I have stopped kidding myself that it is 'some' any longer. TM99 Nov 2014 #56
Would you accept the accusation skepticscott Nov 2014 #71
It's some and most people just stay away. cbayer Nov 2014 #74
I definitely stay away. TM99 Nov 2014 #91
Like I said, most people do. cbayer Nov 2014 #92
some believers are mentally ill, and the fact that religions exploit those people Warren Stupidity Nov 2014 #22
Absolutely mental illness should only be treated by professionals Leontius Nov 2014 #40
Do you include 'exorcists' in 'professionals'? Warren Stupidity Nov 2014 #54
Not unless the exorcist has an MD in the fields that treat mental illness. Leontius Nov 2014 #55
Kinda rules out being an exorcist. AtheistCrusader Nov 2014 #60
There probably exist one idiot who has a degree in psychiatry and performs exorcisms Warren Stupidity Nov 2014 #65
I don't know anyone in this group that has said all believers are mentally ill. Goblinmonger Nov 2014 #38
I'm sorry. Did you forget to stop by A/A on your way over here? cbayer Nov 2014 #39
That's a hateful post, CB Feral Child Nov 2014 #43
A/A = Atheists and Agnostics Leontius Nov 2014 #44
It was still a hateful post. Warren Stupidity Nov 2014 #67
Thanks, Leontius. Feral Child Nov 2014 #70
OK, I hope you are kidding. I was, of course, referring to the Atheist/Agnostic group cbayer Nov 2014 #46
Amazing how many who accept nothing without evidence are quick to leap to conclusions. rug Nov 2014 #49
Yes and they are so rational and driven by reason and data and science! cbayer Nov 2014 #50
Ah, the delightful universe of acronyms. Feral Child Nov 2014 #72
You made an honest mistake because you don't know anything about me cbayer Nov 2014 #77
Fantasies? Feral Child Nov 2014 #84
How is calling your made up stories about me conceited? cbayer Nov 2014 #85
Our discussions won't be any more fruitful Feral Child Nov 2014 #88
Welcome to the religion forum. Warren Stupidity Nov 2014 #94
CB thinks she's subtle Feral Child Nov 2014 #157
cbayer's not a christian. beam me up scottie Nov 2014 #158
it doesn't seem to be more than a public facade Warren Stupidity Nov 2014 #159
Well, christian apologia does make more sense coming from a christian... beam me up scottie Nov 2014 #160
I understand Feral Child Nov 2014 #161
Well, it often seems like you are more concerned about A/A than many of us. Goblinmonger Nov 2014 #82
Oh, I doubt very much that I am more concerned than many of you, cbayer Nov 2014 #83
Yes, I was being specific Goblinmonger Nov 2014 #108
So it's ok for people to hold one position in one group and then cbayer Nov 2014 #109
I defy you to show us where either that thread or the original post is "ugly" skepticscott Nov 2014 #110
Just a question here that you may or may not know the answer to but post 25 in that thread hrmjustin Nov 2014 #118
There were 14 posters in that thread Leontius Nov 2014 #111
That's not a very good score, imo. cbayer Nov 2014 #114
Post 25 in that thread is a real gem. okasha Nov 2014 #116
I just saw that. talk about a wtf moment. hrmjustin Nov 2014 #117
The place s/he sat on to write it. okasha Nov 2014 #121
I a racking my brain to figure out what was meant. hrmjustin Nov 2014 #122
This is not a time for truth. It is a time for beliefs based on faith. cbayer Nov 2014 #119
If you had actually read the blog post behind the question skepticscott Nov 2014 #131
Not what I'm saying either. Goblinmonger Nov 2014 #120
That's fine. It's your group and you make the rules. cbayer Nov 2014 #123
What you do or don't say to MADem has impact on this discussion. Goblinmonger Nov 2014 #124
No, actually it doesn't cbayer Nov 2014 #125
Fair enough Goblinmonger Nov 2014 #126
You may challenge me or point out what you see as inconsistencies anytime you want. cbayer Nov 2014 #127
And yet you can't prove a word of what you claim skepticscott Nov 2014 #132
Facts are a fucking killer too bad you ignore them. Leontius Nov 2014 #41
So who has said that here? Goblinmonger Nov 2014 #81
well leontius said it. Warren Stupidity Nov 2014 #95
Well there you go case solved. Nothing to see here folks keep moving. Leontius Nov 2014 #98
Really. I guess ignorance is bliss as they say, willful or not. Leontius Nov 2014 #99
It's tempting to laugh at this, I know... Act_of_Reparation Nov 2014 #26
I agree that there is a history of harm and potential for harm here. cbayer Nov 2014 #35
And despite your claim to "draw the line at harm" skepticscott Nov 2014 #58
oh really? Previously you have supported the benefits such as "placebo effect". Warren Stupidity Nov 2014 #66
Ah, the Catholic Church. Full of shit as usual, with no clue as to how the universe works, or AtheistCrusader Nov 2014 #59
You're going to get an ulcer. rug Nov 2014 #61
From what? AtheistCrusader Nov 2014 #62
Fulmination. rug Nov 2014 #63
You don't understand me at all. AtheistCrusader Nov 2014 #64
Catholic experts fear for their jobs, make shit up about 'occult activity' and spread fear muriel_volestrangler Nov 2014 #68
After reading this, I have to agree with your assessment here. cbayer Nov 2014 #78
Yeah, people got out of the habit of taking crazy people to doctors Warpy Nov 2014 #79
And even those that did often did not have coverage or had inadequate cbayer Nov 2014 #80
I hope your point isn't skepticscott Nov 2014 #93
Oh it's always amazing how an exorcism thread gets everyone's juices up here. hrmjustin Nov 2014 #87
What on earth posesses them to post the same stuff over and over? rug Nov 2014 #96
lol! it can be rather entertaining. hrmjustin Nov 2014 #97
Demons Leontius Nov 2014 #112
The tired repetition of humans taking the boogey man seriously. AtheistCrusader Nov 2014 #133
Oh, are exorcists the new bogeyman? rug Nov 2014 #135
No, but the field of 'expertise' they claim to be able to deal with, is. AtheistCrusader Nov 2014 #136
Actually I think this is an important article and not flame bait. cbayer Nov 2014 #100
Oh I agree the op is an honest poster. hrmjustin Nov 2014 #101
I agree about the OP but it was still cross-posted from A&A on trotsky's dare. rug Nov 2014 #102
Wow, just wow! I didn't know about the dare. cbayer Nov 2014 #103
I'm sure the suggestion wasn't made for the sake of a robust discussion. rug Nov 2014 #104
Lol! Thanks for the laugh. cbayer Nov 2014 #105
I agree. okasha Nov 2014 #106
Which is why your first response was "Oh, geez, really?". Warren Stupidity Nov 2014 #107
There is no 'legitimate' story about exorcism and the RCC. It's bullshit. AtheistCrusader Nov 2014 #134
The year is 2014. SamKnause Nov 2014 #141
The Middle Ages are alive and kicking. n/t bvf Nov 2014 #142
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Exorcisms on the rise: Oc...»Reply #127