Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Have We Evolved to Be Religious? [View all]
http://ideas.time.com/2012/03/27/have-we-evolved-to-be-religious/?xid=gonewseditFaith makes social groups stronger and confers an evolutionary advantage
By Jonathan Haidt | @jonhaidt | March 27, 2012

We humans have many varieties of religious experience. One of the most common is self-transcendence a feeling becoming part of something larger, grander and nobler. Most people experience this at least a few times in their lives. When the self thins out and melts away, it not only feels good but can be thrilling.
Its as though our minds contain a secret staircase taking us from an ordinary life up to something sacred and deeply interconnected, and the door to that staircase opens only on rare occasions. The worlds many religions have found a variety of ways to help people find and climb the staircase. Some religions employ meditation. Others use spinning, dancing and repetitive movements in combination with music. Some use natural drugs. Many secular people have used these methods too think of the popularity of rave parties, which combine most of these techniques to produce feelings of peace, love, unity and respect. As the great French sociologist Emile Durkheim put it, we are homo duplex, or a two-level man.
The big question is, Why do our minds contain such a staircase? I believe its because there was a long period in human evolution during which it was adaptive to lose the self and merge with others. It wasnt adaptive for individuals to do so, but it was adaptive for groups. As evolutionary biologists David Sloan Wilson and Edward O. Wilson have proposed, religiosity is a biological adaptation for binding groups together and helping them enter a mind-set of one for all, all for one. Groups that developed emotionally intense, binding religions were able, in the long run, to outcompete and outlast groups that were not so tightly bound.
If the human capacity for self-transcendence is an evolutionary adaptation, then the implications are profound. It suggests that religiosity may be a deep part of human nature. I dont mean that we evolved to join gigantic organized religions that kind of religion came along too recently. I mean that we evolved to see sacredness all around us and to join with others into teams that circle around sacred objects, people and ideas. This is why politics is so tribal. Politics is partly profane, its partly about self-interest. But politics is also about sacredness. Its about joining with others to pursue moral ideals. Its about the eternal struggle between good and evil, and we all believe were on the side of the good.
more at link
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The alternative would be admitting Satan^H^H^H^H^HDawkins has a point.
2ndAmForComputers
Mar 2012
#14
Good stuff. Echoes beyond the organized religion mind-set to a bigger picture, yet negates neither.
pinto
Mar 2012
#16
Correction: Evolution only eliminates them if they are a detriment to survival.
trotsky
Apr 2012
#55
More to the point, so what? It may have served a purpose at one point.
Warren Stupidity
Mar 2012
#41
Natural selection and breeding from an intelligent source are not two different things.
Warren Stupidity
Mar 2012
#44
If you read on it is clear that artificial selection is a subset of natural selection.
Warren Stupidity
Mar 2012
#46
Natural Selection has also selected traits in humans that allow us to reason
EvolveOrConvolve
Mar 2012
#39
Where ever it came from being religious, believing in the sacred, does seem to have value.
MissMarple
Apr 2012
#60