Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: The difficulties of cross cultural communication. [View all]edhopper
(37,007 posts)84. This was about interactions within this forum.
Sometimes dismissal of q belief is seen as an insult to the believer, when the comment is about the belief not the person.
On the other hand posts are placed about people in the news who say some stupid and/or harmful shit.
Sometimes disparaging the speaker is called for.
In this case I said what he said is stupid, I still hold with that and explained why. Sorry if you have a problem with it,
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
95 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
As long as your are blustering around here telling people "you're no atheist"
Warren Stupidity
Nov 2014
#4
The post in question is pointing out that how you approach a text influences you're interpretation.
Igel
Nov 2014
#77
Are you saying that the idea of what 'God' is thought to be like is being miscommunicated?
muriel_volestrangler
Nov 2014
#49
So why did you start this sub-thread about double negatives and miscommunication?
muriel_volestrangler
Nov 2014
#51
Who "think(s) that the Aunt in the OP insulted herself as the sister"?
muriel_volestrangler
Nov 2014
#95
Honestly, I think he's fishing for someone to lose their temper at this point.
AtheistCrusader
Nov 2014
#21